NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—Patients undergoing total joint replacement are younger now than they were in 2000, new research indicates.
Also by this Author
The average patient undergoing a total hip replacement (THR) in 2014 was 64.9 years, while the average patient in 2000 was 66.3 years. Similarly, the average patient undergoing a total knee replacement (TKR) was 65.9 in 2014, and was 68.0 in 2000, according to a review of data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.
“These differences may not seem like much, but an average decrease of two years in a pool of 1 million people is a significant difference,” lead researcher Dr. Matthew Sloan, an orthopedic resident at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, tells Reuters Health by email. “It’s also a meaningful difference, when you take into account the fact that these total joint replacements have a finite lifespan.”
“The technology for total hip and knee replacements continues to improve,” he adds. “However, at some point the implant wears out. We believe modern implants without any unforeseen complications should last 20 years or more. The problem with an increasingly younger group of patients having these procedures, it becomes more likely that the implant will wear out during their lifetime. When this happens, a second surgery is required to revise the joint replacement. These procedures are not as successful as the initial surgeries, they are bigger operations, they take longer, and now the patient is 20 years older and not as strong as they were when they had the initial procedure.”
For these reasons, revision joint replacement surgeries are riskier and prone to higher rates of complications, such as early failure or infection. The goal is to wait as long as possible, so that the patient may only need to undergo a single surgery in their life, he adds.
Using the NIS database, Dr. Sloan and Dr. Neil Sheth, also at the University of Pennsylvania, evaluated trends in age, sex and race among people who had total joint replacement. They reported their findings March 8 at the American Society of Orthopaedic Surgeons’ annual meeting.1
The data show that women continue to make up the majority of THR and TKR patients (55–62%), although men are making up a larger proportion of these patients than they did in 2000.
“We know that women have a higher rate of arthritis compared to men, which may be why they undergo these procedures more commonly,” Dr. Sloan said. “However, we don’t know what other factors may play a role in the decision to undergo surgical treatment.”
Non-Hispanic whites make up the vast majority of patients who undergo total hip and knee replacements. The main reason for this, explained Dr. Sloan, is that they are the largest demographic segment by proportion in the United States. However, they are disproportionately undergoing total joint replacement relative to their percentage of the population.
In 2014, non-Hispanic whites made up 62% of the U.S. population, but underwent 86% of the THR and 82% of the TKR procedures. The second-most common group to undergo these procedures were blacks, who made up 13% of the U.S. population in 2014 and accounted for 8% of the patients undergoing THR and TKR.
Even more under-represented were Hispanics, making up 18% of the U.S. population and only 3% of THR and 6% of TKR procedures, followed by Asians who made up 6% of the U.S. population and 1% of the procedures, Dr. Sloan said.
It’s not possible to know the reasons for these differences from the raw data, “but one would assume a main driver is access to care. Access to surgeons and insurance to pay for surgical treatment may be more common among non-Hispanic whites than other racial groups. Further, there may be cultural or social differences among groups that cause non-Hispanic whites to pursue surgical treatments, while Asians seem to avoid surgery,” Dr. Sloan said.
Total joint replacement is one of the most commonly performed elective surgical procedures in the United States. According to NIS data, in 2014, there were more than 370,000 THR and 680,000 TKR surgeries.
Based on a predictive model that Drs. Sloan and Sheth developed, by 2030, primary THR is projected to reach 635,000 (171% increase) and primary TKR, 1.28 million (189% increase). Similar increases are expected for revision THR and TKR.
“These numbers are always changing,” Sloan noted in a conference statement. “We will continue to look at new data as the numbers need to be constantly updated, especially if they are used to make predictions for future healthcare saving decisions, as the impact can be in the millions of dollars. It’s imperative to provide policy makers with high-quality data to inform decisions that will affect patient access to orthopaedic care and the financial viability of elective orthopedic procedures.”
- Sloan M, Sheth NP. Projected orthopaedic surgeon workforce shortfall for primary and revision total joint arthroplasty procedures, 2030–2060. American Society of Orthopaedic Surgeons’ Annual Meeting. 2018 Mar 8.