Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Proposed CMS Physician Fee Schedule May Offer Slight Increases

Carol Patton  |  August 4, 2016

All eyes are on the new physician fee schedule proposed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), which will be finalized this year and go into effect Jan. 1. The ACR is reviewing the proposal and will be providing comments and recommendations to CMS. And many rheumatologists have payment and coding questions: Will fees increase or decrease? Will stiff requirements be attached to specific codes?

Although there are no clear answers, healthcare experts believe physicians may recognize payment reductions for some services and increases for others. Meanwhile, rheumatologists should be focused on developing strategies to improve quality and decrease overall costs, which will be rewarded under the new schedule, according to Lucy Zielinski, vice president at GE Healthcare Camden Group, a national healthcare business advisory and activation firm in Chicago.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

What’s Proposed?
The main focus of the 856-page fee schedule document is to improve the value of primary care services and health outcomes. CMS is also proposing an increase in payments for several care management services, such as those rendered to patients with mobility-related disabilities or complex-care management services.

Some of the service and billing requirements for the chronic management code (99490) may also be eased, says Ms. Zielinski. “Before, some of the requirements [for certain codes] were pretty intense and too difficult for physicians to observe. Last year, Medicare anticipated that a higher volume [of codes with strict requirements] would be submitted, but that was not the case. So CMS is now loosening up some of these requirements and expanding CCM [chronic-care management] coding.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

As an example of restrictions being relaxed, she points to electronic sharing of care plan information. Instead of making this information electronically available 24/7 to other practitioners, the proposed rule would require care plans to be made available in a “timely” fashion to other practitioners, remove the requirement to document the provision of the care plan to the beneficiary using EHR technology and no longer requires physicians to obtain written agreement and patient consent.

 Good News for Rheumatologists
Ms. Zielinski says the rule proposes that CMS pay for services for patients with chronic conditions who require complex CCM services (99487 and 99489)—good news for rheumatologists who often treat patients with comorbid, complex conditions. The agency is not, however, proposing to change the requirement that CCM services may be billed only by the one provider who assumes the care management role for a particular patient.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice SupportProfessional Topics Tagged with:Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)Medicare ReimbursementPhysician fee schedule

Related Articles
    Prepare NOW for ICD-10 Medical Coding Transition

    Prepare NOW for ICD-10 Medical Coding Transition

    July 14, 2015

    The ICD-10 page on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) website features a countdown clock that shows the time left until Oct. 1, 2015, the date on which compliance with the new code set becomes mandatory. By the time this issue goes to press, the clock will read 90 or fewer days. Time…

    ACR Leads Fight Against Proposed Reimbursement Cuts to E/M Services

    August 7, 2018

    On July 12, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued its proposed plan for changes to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for 2019.1 Citing the need to reduce paperwork and improve patient care, the CMS detailed a number of changes to payments physicians receive from Medicare that could have a significant impact on…

    ACR Continues to Press CMS to Make Changes to E/M Codes

    January 18, 2018

    On Dec. 8, 2017, members of the Cognitive Care Alliance (CCA)—of which the ACR is a leading member—met with members of Congress on the Hill and representatives from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to discuss ongoing concerns about the inadequacy of existing evaluation and management (E/M) codes to properly remunerate cognitive services…

    ACR Responds to 2022 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule

    September 14, 2021

    Rheumatology leaders are encouraged by continued implementation of E/M coding changes, telehealth flexibilities and rheumatology-specific MIPS Value Pathway, but have concerns regarding conversion factor reductions and the CMS EHR interoperability and digital quality measures proposal.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences