Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2012: Electronic Portals Appeal to Patients

Thomas R. Collins  |  Issue: March 2013  |  March 1, 2013

WASHINGTON, D.C.—A recent survey of patients found that three-quarters of them would use a secure electronic portal to access their medical information if it were made available to them. That’s a big number.

But even more striking is this: Almost half of those patients—47%—would actually consider switching doctors to one that provides a portal, according to a 2011 survey conducted by Decipher Research for Intuit Health.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Of all the reasons to start offering a patient portal, that might be one of the most compelling ones, experts said here at the at the recent 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, held November 9–14. They made their comments in a session titled, “Innovations for the Office,” that focused on the emergence of the portals, both as a helpful feature in medical offices and as a federal requirement.

Fifty-three percent of Generation X respondents said they would consider switching for a portal, and 59% of Generation Y respondents said they would, compared to 29% of Baby Boomers.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“The younger ones, they’ll jump, so there’s absolutely good reason to be putting in personal health records,” said Larry Garber, MD, an internist and medical director for informatics at Reliant Medical Group in Worcester, Mass. “They improve the quality of care, the safety of care, the efficiency of care, they make my staff more efficient, they make me more efficient. My patients love it. The government’s making you do it. So what are you waiting for?”

Portals and Meaningful Use

Robert Warren, MD, PhD, MPH, chief medical information officer at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, said laws and regulations are driving the engagement of patients in their own healthcare through electronic means. Incentives and penalties include the “meaningful use” of electronic health records, value-based purchasing, accountable care organizations, “medical home” programs, and payments based on outcomes and patient experience.

In Stage 1 of the Meaningful Use program, to become a “meaningful user,” health professionals and hospitals have to give patients electronic copies of their health information upon request within three business days. In Stage 2, they have to provide patients with the ability to view online, download, and transmit their health information within four business days of the information being available to the health professional; provide patients with clinical summaries for each office visit; and demonstrate the use of secure electronic messaging to communicate with patients.

To push the issue, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services plans to publish a list of “meaningful users.”

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice Support Tagged with:ACR/ARHP Annual Meetingpatient communicationTechnology

Related Articles

    Online Portals Can Function as Important Physician–Patient Communication Tools

    February 16, 2016

    Patient portals are online programs and applications that help patients and physicians interact. Although there are many different implementations, most will have some sort of messaging component to help with communication between the doctor and the patient, as well as access to at least some elements of the chart, such as test results. “Patients should…

    The 2020 ACR Awards of Distinction & Masters Class

    November 12, 2020

    Presidential Gold Medal The highest award the ACR can bestow, the Presidential Gold Medal is awarded in recognition of outstanding achievements in rheumatology over an entire career. This year’s award went to James O’Dell, MD, the Stokes-Shackleford Professor of Internal Medicine, vice chair of internal medicine and chief of the Division of Rheumatology at the…

    Make Critical Electronic Health Record Decisions Now to Avoid Penalties and Maximize Incentives

    January 25, 2013

    Rheumatology practices of all sizes are considering the most cost-efficient and effective ways to achieve Meaningful Use.

    Are Electronic Health Records a Plague or Panacea?

    January 17, 2011

    EHRs hold promise, but there are still plenty of kinks

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences