Video: Superheroes, Secret Identities & You| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Lupus Nephritis
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • Technology
      • Information Technology
      • Apps
    • QA/QI
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
      • Education & Training
    • Certification
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

The ACR Advocates for Reinstatement of Members of CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices

Joseph Cantrell, JD  |  August 9, 2025

In response to the recent removal of members from the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the ACR and 20 partner organizations submitted a response letter to Department of Health & Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., urging the reinstatement of the terminated experts and reaffirming its commitment to science-based immunization policy.

Why This Matters for Rheumatology

For more than 50 years, the ACIP has provided independent, evidence-based recommendations that guide vaccine use across the U.S. These guidelines are essential for public health and are especially important for our patients with autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases, many of whom are immunocompromised due to their conditions or treatment regimens.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Vaccines remain one of the most effective tools for protecting at-risk patients from serious, potentially life-threatening infections. ACR members rely on the ACIP’s expert-driven guidance to make safe, timely vaccination decisions for rheumatology patients. Disrupting this process—particularly by removing respected experts in immunology, infectious disease and clinical practice—undermines the scientific rigor and transparency that have long defined the ACIP’s work.

This decision comes at a critical time. The U.S. is already seeing the resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases, including measles outbreaks in multiple states. Patients with rheumatic diseases face greater risks from these infections. Any breakdown in the immunization infrastructure could worsen vaccine hesitancy, disrupt clinical guidance and ultimately endanger the most vulnerable patients.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Beyond the clinical consequences, the removal of ACIP experts may also affect insurance coverage and access to vaccines. Most health plans base vaccine coverage on CDC recommendations, which are informed by the ACIP’s schedules. Without credible, science-backed guidance, coverage decisions may change, leaving patients—especially those with chronic illnesses, such as lupus or rheumatoid arthritis—facing reduced access to critical immunizations.

The ACR’s Position

In its letter to Secretary Kennedy, the ACR made the following key requests:

  • Immediately reinstate the terminated ACIP members to restore the panel’s expertise and continuity;
  • Maintain a transparent, evidence-based process for appointing future ACIP members; and
  • Preserve the independence and scientific integrity of the ACIP to ensure that vaccine guidance remains accurate, timely and free from political influence.

The ACR remains committed to protecting rheumatology patients and preserving trust in public health institutions. The ACR will continue to advocate for policies that ensure safe, equitable and science-based vaccine access for all Americans, especially those with autoimmune and rheumatic diseases.

Read the full letter here.

Share: 

Filed under:Legislation & Advocacy Tagged with:CDCvaccines

Related Articles

    The End of the Beginning: COVID-19 Vaccines & Other Conundrums

    December 9, 2020

    “It’s like winning Powerball.” For months, there has been a steady trickle of questions from my patients, asking for my opinion about the new vaccines being developed to prevent COVID-19. More to the point, they want to know if they should be vaccinated. ad goes here:advert-1ADVERTISEMENTSCROLL TO CONTINUEAfter some fits and starts, I finally struck…

    Vaccine Hesitancy: Wariness Is Rare, But There’s a Wider Worry About COVID Vaccines’ Efficacy in Some Populations

    July 6, 2021

    Hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccination persists nationwide, although it varies among regions and sociodemographic groups.

    ACR Convergence 2020

    ACR Convergence 2020: Progress Toward COVID-19 Vaccines

    November 11, 2020

    ACR CONVERGENCE 2020—A scientific session on Sunday, Nov. 8, focused on vaccine prospects in COVID-19. Dan Barouch, MD, PhD, director of the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and the William Bosworth Castle Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston, shared his insights about vaccine development across…

    Space & Other Races

    October 19, 2020

    On April 5, 1950, a small group of scientists met in Silver Spring, Md., to talk about geophysics. I know this is not the most riveting way to start, but if you stick with me, I promise the story will get much more interesting. ad goes here:advert-1ADVERTISEMENTSCROLL TO CONTINUEThis group of scientists met to discuss…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences