Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

ACR Leads Fight Against Proposed Reimbursement Cuts to E/M Services

Mary Beth Nierengarten  |  August 7, 2018

“Because rheumatologists generally see patients that are more complex than average, and engage in cognitive services instead of procedures, rheumatologists will likely face reimbursement cuts if this proposal goes into effect, “he says. “Since even small reimbursement cuts are magnified after overhead expenses are paid, rheumatologists may face pressure not to participate in Medicare.”

To put this into numbers, the CMS estimates a 3% cut in reimbursement for E/M services. Such a cut, says Dr. Worthing, could be magnified by a multiple of 2 or 3 because of fixed and rising business overhead costs. For a rheumatologist with an overhead of 70%, he says, a 3% reimbursement cut may actually look more like a 10% salary cut once overhead costs are figured in.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Colin Edgerton, MD, chair of the ACR committee on Rheumatologic Care, highlighted the impact this type of financial strain will have on patient care. “Patients will suffer; they may see reduced access to rheumatologists, shorter appointments and a focus on treating fewer complaints during each appointment,” he says.

Both Drs. Worthing and Edgerton also worry about the effect this reduction in reimbursement will have on attracting needed physicians to the specialty of rheumatology.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“A bigger concern is that rheumatology is already facing a significant projected workforce reduction,” says Dr. Edgerton. “These cuts make rheumatology a less attractive specialty for graduating residents and may further reduce the number of available rheumatologists in the future.”

Priority No. 1 & How You Can Help
The ACR has made this issue its current No. 1 advocacy priority. The ACR is leading a broad coalition of stakeholders, including other medical specialties and patient groups, to advocate against the proposed changes, says Dr. Edgerton.

In addition, the ACR is meeting with lawmakers and staff on Capitol Hill and the CMS, as well as talking to media outlets. The New York Times and National Public Radio recently covered the ACR’s opposition to the proposal.

“The ACR will be sending public comments and working with partners, like the American Academy of Neurology, to organize a letter to Capitol Hill for members of Congress to express concerns with CMS, as well as a coalition letter to the CMS asking it not to proceed with this proposal that could reduce access to rheumatology care,” says Dr. Worthing.

He adds that help from members is especially needed. “Democracy requires informed input from as many people as possible, and I encourage ACR/ARHP members to send an email to their members of Congress through the ACR Legislative Action Center and to send comments directly to CMS.” Contributions to RheumPAC from U.S.-based ACR and ARHP members are another way members can get involved in the efforts.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legislation & Advocacy Tagged with:Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)evaluation and management (E/M)Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS)reimbursement cuts

Related Articles

    Speak Up: Ask Congress to Block Medicare Reimbursement Cuts

    October 22, 2021

    Rheumatologists may need to downsize and restrict patient care if Congress doesn’t act to block significant cuts to Medicare reimbursement rates totaling 9.75% in 2022.

    Rheumatologists React to Looming Medicare Payment Reductions

    November 1, 2011

    MedPAC recommends deep cuts to physician payments

    15% E/M Services Reimbursement Hike a Win for Rheumatology

    February 19, 2020

    ACR advocacy leaders are celebrating a 15% planned increase in reimbursement for rheumatology evaluation and management services and are calling on members to thank Congress.

    Payments Cut to the Bone

    February 1, 2007

    CMS reduces reimbursement for DXA and vertebral fracture assessment

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences