Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

ACR Pushes for Patient Interests, Against Spending Cuts

Angus Worthing, MD, FACP, FACR  |  July 5, 2017

Speaking of APMs, if you are aware of the possible reimbursement cuts to Medicare providers coming through MIPS, you may be interested in how a rheumatology-related APM may allow you to avoid them. For several months, a team of your fellow ACR volunteers has been designing an APM for this purpose. The team is focusing on RA, and the experience may lead to APM tracks for other disease states. Stay tuned.

Biosimilars
The ACR commented on the FDA’s proposed interchangeable pathway in late May. Your advocacy team strongly supports the FDA’s proposal for interchangeable biosimilar clinical trials to switch patients between a reference drug and its biosimilar at least three times (A-B-A-B) to prove safety and efficacy. The College also came out in support of meaningful suffixes that would make biosimilar names more memorable and easier to work with. The Biosimilars Prescribers Collaborative released a succinct white paper on biosimilars with great information and advocacy points; the ACR contributed to this document, and I highly recommend reading it. My recent op ed details some of the current issues and salient points about interchangeability. Stay tuned for an ACR white paper on biosimilars coming later this summer/fall.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

#ACR2017
As we learn of the scientific findings coming out of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2017 Congress this past week, we’re reminded that the 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting is just around the corner. Unfortunately, due to the new extreme vetting of visitors to the U.S., the ACR, like other organizations, is anticipating a possible drop in international attendees at the meeting. To help mitigate this issue, the ACR offers a website with tips and information for international travelers. Please spread the word to your international colleagues and friends—and keep the ACR’s meeting strong and fruitful.

Coalition Challenges PBMs
The ACR has joined the Alliance for Transparent & Affordable Prescriptions, a coalition dedicated to transparency for pharmacy benefit managers. Congress is holding hearings on PBMs and the drug pricing system—as the major industry stakeholders start pointing fingers at each other. Recently, coverage has increased in the press and medical literature. See topical stories in the following publications (apologies for the paywalls): the Journal of the American Medical Association, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

MedPAC Déjà Vu
MedPAC, the independent U.S. federal policy commission, is at it again. It has proposed a reduction in reimbursement for Medicare Part B drug administration services and allowing companies to create prior authorization programs and other barriers to Medicare treatments. In response, the ACR and many state rheumatology societies sent a letter to HHS Secretary Price urging him not to adopt the recommendations. The ACR’s advocacy team is watching this closely and will respond forcefully—with your help—if CMS begins to adopt any of these plans.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EULAR/OtherFrom the CollegeLegislation & AdvocacyMeeting ReportsProfessional Topics Tagged with:ACR advocacyAlliance for Transparent & Affordable Prescriptions (ATAP)alternative payment models (APMs)BiosimilarsEULARMedPacMIPSObamacare repealpharmacy benefit managers (PBMs)Washington D.C. update

Related Articles

    Marching to the Biosimilar Beat: Questions on Rollout Remain

    September 7, 2023

    The availability of biosimilars for the treatment of patients with rheumatic diseases exploded in 2023. Here’s where we stand and what to expect going forward.

    Speak Up: Ask Congress to Block Medicare Reimbursement Cuts

    October 22, 2021

    Rheumatologists may need to downsize and restrict patient care if Congress doesn’t act to block significant cuts to Medicare reimbursement rates totaling 9.75% in 2022.

    Report on EU’s Experience with Biosimilar Drugs Released: Will U.S. Experience Be Similar?

    October 17, 2017

    As questions about biosimilar medications swirl among U.S. rheumatologists, a recently released report sheds some light on the European experience with biosimilars—and may offer some important insights for the U.S. market. The report, Biosimilars in the EU: Information Guide for Healthcare Professionals, was released in late April by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the…

    The Biosimilars Debate Heats Up: Potential cost savings weighed against patient health & safety

    March 1, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences