Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

The Why & What of the ACR’s Clinical Practice Guidelines

Ruth Jessen Hickman, MD  |  Issue: February 2018  |  February 18, 2018

The next step is assembling a complete and systematic review of the medical literature that directly or indirectly addresses the chosen scenarios. This review is performed by a literature review team working in consultation with the core leadership team and the broader guideline development group. This team compiles the evidence to address the questions the expert panel helped develop. The evidence addressing all the chosen questions is presented in a systematic report.

Next, a separate voting panel examines the evidence report. Dr. Neogi explains, “The voting panel then reviews the evidence for those questions and determines what recommendations to make.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

This voting panel comprises rheumatologists, other relevant specialists (including primary care, where appropriate), stakeholders with clinical expertise in the target treatment areas and patient participants. After voting, the findings are compiled into a guideline draft that then undergoes a process of peer review by the ACR and its journals before final publication. Each guideline must be reviewed and endorsed by the ACR Guideline Subcommittee, Quality of Care Committee and Board of Directors.

The ACR … requires more than half of the guideline development team’s experts have no conflicts of interest with regard to industry support in the topic area of the guideline.

Specifics of the GRADE methodology

The ACR currently uses a specific system to develop its guidelines: the GRADE methodology (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation), an internationally accepted systematic approach to guideline development.

GRADE is not the only such rating system available. Many earlier ACR guidelines (such as the 2012 gout guidelines) used the RAND/UCLA method, a somewhat different method of compiling and evaluating evidence.6

GRADE was used in the following ACR guidelines: osteoarthritis (2012), axial spondylo­arthritis (2015), polymyalgia rheumatica (2015), rheumatoid arthritis (2015), glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (2017) and perioperative management of antirheumatic medication (2017).3,7-11 Comparing it with the RAND/UCLA method, Dr. Caplan notes, “GRADE is more explicit and systematic about how a level of evidence is translated into a recommendation and more transparent about the limitations of the evidence.”

GRADE has certain other advantages over other rating systems. Unlike some other methods, it clearly distinguishes the quality of evidence from the strength of recommendations. It provides clear and pragmatic interpretations for strong vs. conditional recommendations. GRADE gives explicit and comprehensive criteria for downgrading or upgrading quality-of-evidence ratings. It focuses on the evaluation assessing two or more discreet alternative management strategies rather than general management principles. Another advantage is that GRADE explicitly acknowledges that values and preferences should play a role in recommendations.12

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice Support Tagged with:Clinical Practice GuidelinesThe American College of Rheumatology

Related Articles
    Dr. Caplan turned 106 on Nov. 21 and remains physically and mentally active.

    Paul S. Caplan, MD: A Physician’s Journey

    March 8, 2020

    Editor’s note: It is with much sadness that we learned this morning that Paul Caplan, MD, passed away yesterday, March 7, 2020. “He was a remarkable person who continued to celebrate life up to the end,” says Terence W. Starz, MD, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. “He had a great caring, wisdom, and commitment…

    Alisusha; Trueffelpix / shutterstock.com

    3 New Vasculitis Guidelines Discussed

    May 13, 2021

    The ACR, in concert with the Vasculitis Foundation, released three new vasculitis guidelines online first in July, with a fourth slated for publication by the end of the year. These are the first ever to be produced and endorsed by the ACR and the Vasculitis Foundation. Although most of the recommendations are conditional, due to…

    Vasculitis Guidelines in Focus, Part 6: Giant Cell Arteritis

    September 27, 2022

    In 2021, the ACR—in concert with the Vasculitis Foundation (VF)—released four new vasculitis guidelines, one each on: 1) anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis, 2) giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis, 3) polyarteritis nodosa and 4) Kawasaki disease. The guideline development process is complex. For the vasculitis guidelines, this process kicked off in June…

    Updated Perioperative Guideline Released: Recommendations Balance Risks of Infection & Disease Flare

    September 13, 2022

    The 2017 recommendations are updated to reflect changes in medical literature, as well as to include newly approved drugs.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences