Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Do a Lack of Information & Social Support Affect Lupus Outcomes?

Renée Bacher   |  Issue: September 2019  |  September 17, 2019

1) Ambiguous, Inconsistent & Unpredictable Symptoms

Dr. Kim

Dr. Kim

Despite visits to multiple physicians in a variety of subspecialties, answers and a diagnosis linking a wide range of initial symptoms (e.g., constant fatigue, joint pain, rash and photosensitivity) in the pre-diagnosis stage proved difficult to come by.

Even after a diagnosis of SLE, patients still experienced ambiguity associated with their symptoms, which could change within a patient over the course of the disease during flares affecting different organs. Variability in pain, fatigue and other symptoms affected employment and social engagements, and made an impact on an SLE patient’s ability to plan their days.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Additionally, symptoms may vary a great deal from patient to patient, meaning respondents had difficulty finding a common pattern of symptoms between themselves and others with SLE.

According to Mr. Leung, one strategy that emerged from the 2019 Lupus meeting from the Duke University Lupus Clinic is to use a simple subclassification to categorize patients’ clinical symptoms.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“Type 1 symptoms refer to the standard things rheumatologists are concerned with, such as inflammation, damage, activity and organ involvement,” Mr. Leung says. “Type 2 symptoms refer to aspects of lupus that are usually of primary concern to the patient, such as fatigue, bodywide pain, sleep deprivation and depression. Medication typically only addresses type 1 symptoms.”

Using these classifications can improve physician-patient communication because it acknowledges that patients’ type 1 lupus and type 2 lupus symptoms can change independently.

2) Poor Communication

Mr. Leung

Mr. Leung

Respondents struggled with their healthcare providers’ lack of knowledge and misconceptions about SLE and expressed the need for more information about SLE from these health professionals. They also expressed general confusion about some aspects of their disease. They mentioned wanting their rheumatologists to fulfill the role of providing this information, and they also wanted these professionals to do a better job of listening to patient questions and concerns. Some felt their rheumatologists had preconceived notions (based on other patients or medical texts) of how their symptoms were supposed to present rather than accepting what their patients were telling them about their symptoms.

“We all need social support, regardless of presence of disease,” Mr. Leung says. “With lupus, what may be going on is that specific aspects of the disease, namely the variability and inconsistency of symptoms, prevent patients from maintaining sources of social support. Part of this maintenance is done through communication with friends, family and physicians. But when specific aspects of lupus prevent patients from effectively communicating, those sources of social support begin to erode.”

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsPatient PerspectiveResearch RheumSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Tagged with:physician-patient communicationpsycho-socialSocial Networking

Related Articles

    Rheumatologists, Social Workers Collaborate to Help Patients with Lupus

    April 19, 2017

    At the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS), New York, rheumatologists and social workers have found that an interdisciplinary approach to care for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients improves the overall patient experience. “Our goal is to help patients navigate the complex healthcare system,” says Jillian Rose, LCSW, MPH, assistant director, Community Engagement, Diversity & Research….

    Lupus often presents with a butterfly rash.

    Top 12: Research in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus at a Glance

    November 18, 2021

    Dr. Pisetsky’s picks for the top research in lupus presented at ACR Convergence 2021.

    T Cells in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    August 1, 2011

    Progress toward targeted therapy

    Genome-Wide Association Studies of SLE

    February 12, 2011

    What do these studies tell us about disease mechanisms in lupus?

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences