Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Have We Reached an Estrogen Comfort Zone?

Jill P. Buyon, MD  |  Issue: May 2007  |  May 1, 2007

click for large version
figure 1: Treatment for one year with OCs is unlikely to cause lupus flares (in inactive or stable-active patients without antiphospholid/anticardiolipin antibodies and/or history of thrombosis).1 Subjects were randomized to receive triphasic ethinylestradiol 35 mg plus norethindrone 0.5-1 mg for twelve cycles of 28 days.

Serious adverse events were rare in the cohort as a whole. There was one serious adverse event—a deep venous thrombosis—among the OC subjects, and three serious adverse events in the placebo group: one ocular thrombosis (after randomization but prior to taking placebo), one superficial thrombophlebitis, and one death a year after study drug (placebo) was discontinued due to severe flare at three months. None of the three subjects who experienced thrombotic adverse events had developed anticardiolipin antibodies.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Another compelling prospective study evaluating the safety of OCs was conducted in Mexico.3 This was a single-blind trial that enrolled 162 women with SLE. Patients were randomized to combined oral contraceptives (30 µg ethinyl estradiol plus 150 µg levonorgestrel), a progestin-only pill (30 µg levonorgestrel), or a copper intra-uterine device (IUD) (TCu 380A, Orthopharmaceuticals), with 54 patients in each treatment group. In this study, the primary outcome was global disease activity, not a severe flare per se. In contrast to SELENA, it was not specifically stated whether women could have received OCs after the diagnosis of SLE for any period of time. Furthermore, patients were not excluded based on titers of anticardiolipin antibodies.

Disease activity remained mild and stable in all groups throughout the course of evaluation. There were no significant differences among the groups during the trial in disease activity, incidence or probability of flares, or medication use. Thromboses occurred in four patients (two in each of the two groups receiving hormones). The authors of this study concluded that global disease activity, maximum SLE Disease Activity Index score, incidence of flares, time to first flare, and incidence of adverse events were similar among patients with SLE, irrespective of the type of contraceptive they received.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The SELENA-HRT study comprised 351 menopausal SLE patients enrolled from 16 university-affiliated rheumatology clinics/practices in 11 U.S. states. Patients were randomized to twelve months of treatment with active drug (0.625 mg conjugated estrogen daily plus an additional pill containing 5 mg medroxyprogesterone for days 1 through 12 of the month) or placebo, and evaluations at months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 from the time of enrollment. The occurrence of severe flare was rare in both treatment groups: the 12-month severe-flare rate was 0.081 for HRT and 0.049 for placebo, yielding an estimated difference in severe-flare rates of 0.033 (P=0.23). (See Figure 2) The upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was 0.078, which was within the pre-specified margin of 0.09 for non-inferiority.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsResearch RheumSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Tagged with:ResearchSystemic lupus erythematosustherapy

Related Articles

    The ACR Introduces a New Reproductive Health Guideline

    March 12, 2020

    Reproductive health can be a concern for patients with rheumatic diseases, and practitioners in both rheumatology and obstetrics/gynecology often work closely together. The 2020 ACR Guideline for the Management of Reproductive Health in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, new clinical recommendations developed by an ACR-convened group for pregnant women, post-menopausal women, lactating women, and women and…

    The ACR Has Introduced a New Reproductive Health Guideline Draft

    January 17, 2019

    CHICAGO—Reproductive health can be a concern for patients with rheumatic diseases, and practitioners in both disciplines often work closely together. The Reproductive Health in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases Guideline, a draft of new clinical recommendations developed by an ACR-convened group for pregnant women, post-menopausal women, lactating women, and women and men trying to conceive or…

    The ACR Introduces New Reproductive Health Guideline

    March 4, 2020

    The evidence-based guideline includes contraceptive recommendations and suggestions for rheumatologists co-managing patients with obstetrician-gynecologists and other specialists.

    Antiphospholipid Antibody Testing Update

    January 13, 2012

    Successes, challenges, and controversies of diagnostic methods for APS

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences