Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Hospital Acquisitions of Physician Practices Likely to Decrease

Steven M. Harris, Esq.  |  Issue: February 2016  |  February 16, 2016

max sattana/shutterstock.com

Image Credit: max sattana/shutterstock.com

On Nov. 2, 2015, President Barack Obama signed the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (the Act) into law. This critical piece of legislation raises the federal debt ceiling and provides the framework for the federal budget through 2017. Of particular importance, the Act significantly changes the way Medicare will reimburse hospitals for outpatient services furnished in new off-campus hospital outpatient departments. This change signals the end of the incentive for hospitals to acquire physician practices to obtain a more favorable reimbursement rate.

Limited Payment

Specifically, Section 603 of the Act will limit Medicare reimbursement for services provided in new hospital outpatient departments to the amounts that the physician practice would receive for the same services, rather than the higher payments that hospitals have traditionally received under the Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) after converting physician practices to hospital outpatient departments.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Currently, Medicare reimburses providers differently depending on certain factors, including whether the service is inpatient or outpatient, the location where the service is provided and the type of provider. Medicare generally pays hospitals more for physician office visits and related procedures and tests when the services are performed in a hospital outpatient department setting than a traditional physician practice receives for the same services. This is because the hospital receives both a facility fee under OPPS and a professional fee, with the combined amounts generally exceeding the payment that a physician practice would receive under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. This opportunity for higher reimbursement has been criticized for providing a financial incentive for hospitals to acquire physician practices and convert the practices to hospital outpatient departments.

MedPAC & White House Support

The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), which is tasked with finding financial savings in Medicare, has expressed concern that evaluation and management visits and other services have been moving from physician offices to hospital outpatient department sites, resulting in higher Medicare and beneficiary spending. To reduce incentives to shift care to hospital outpatient department facilities when the patient does not need hospital-level care, MedPAC recommended adjusting the OPPS payment rates so that Medicare payment for evaluation and management office visits and various other services would be the same regardless of whether the services were provided in a physician practice or a hospital outpatient department. Paying the same amount regardless of the site of service is often referred to as site-neutral payment or site neutrality.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Education & TrainingLegal Updates Tagged with:Bipartisan Budget ActhospitalincentiveMedicarephysician practiceReimbursement

Related Articles

    Medical Education Goes Global

    August 1, 2011

    Rheumatology plays a role in med schools’ growing international partnerships

    Hospital-Owned Physician Practices Linked to Higher Prices

    October 21, 2015

    (Reuters Health)—Outpatient care may cost more when hospitals own the medical practices or employ the physicians, a U.S. study suggests. Hospital employment of doctors and ownership of physician practices has grown over the past decade as healthcare providers seek to curb expenses with economies of scale and deliver better coordinated treatment to patients. ad goes…

    New No-Surprises Rules May Affect Rheumatology Services at Hospitals

    April 15, 2022

    This month, we offer an overview of the federal No Surprises Act, which stipulates that healthcare insurers may not surprise patients with out-of-network care bills, instead requiring healthcare providers and insurers to broker price compromises between themselves. The No Surprises Act, enacted on a bipartisan basis in December 2020, protects patients from surprise billing from…

    How Hospital Design Can Promote Better Patient Outcomes

    December 15, 2016

    A storm has been brewing down the street from my office. It is a David & Goliath dispute, pitting young children and their families against a renowned pediatric institution, Boston Children’s Hospital. It concerns the fate of a half-acre swath of green space, the Prouty Garden, replete with meandering paths, fountains and a towering redwood…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences