Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Patients Value Convenience of Telemedicine

Lisa Rapaport  |  April 30, 2019

(Reuters Health)—Patients who have real-time video visits with their primary care providers instead of in-person exams are generally satisfied with the convenience and quality of their checkups, a new study suggests.

There’s a lot about these telemedicine visits that can sound appealing: no need to get stuck in traffic on the way to the doctor; no long stretches in the waiting room before the exam; no missing half a day of work for an appointment that’s over in the blink of an eye. But, to date, research hasn’t offered a clear picture of how the reality of virtual visits matches up with patients’ expectations

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“Prior to the current study, there was very little research evidence about primary-care video visits, especially when the visits are with a patient’s own primary care providers (the ones they also visit in-person) as a part of their ongoing clinical care,” says lead study author Mary Reed, DrPH, of Kaiser Permanente Northern California.

Dr. Reed and colleagues surveyed 1,274 patients at Kaiser in Northern California who had a scheduled video visit with a primary care provider in autumn 2015 to see how well the technology and the medical care worked for them.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Nearly all of the participants had some previous experience using video calling, although it may have been for personal or professional meetings and not for a medical checkup. Most of them also had undergraduate or advanced degrees and more than a third had household income of more than $100,000 a year.

Patients who had to take time off from work or other responsibilities for an in-person visit reported more often that the video visit reduced their in-person visits.

As reported April 29 online in Annals of Internal Medicine, there were many reasons patients cited for having video visits: 87% found it more convenient; 82% liked that they could have the video visit with their regular primary care provider; and 70% were not sure they needed to go see a doctor in person.1

After the video exams, 93% of patients felt the checkup met their needs; 92% felt the provider was familiar with their medical history; and 90% were confident in the quality of their care.

Additionally, 84% of patients who had video visits thought the experience improved their relationship with their provider.

However, 41% of participants said they preferred an in-person visit, 24% expressed concern about making their home or video visit space presentable for the checkup, and 21% of patients worried they might not get adequate treatment.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Technology Tagged with:patient carepatient perspectivetelemedicinevideo-based telemedicine

Related Articles

    The Doctor Will See You Now: Legal & Regulatory Reforms Expand Telemedicine

    March 17, 2020

    In this time of COVID-19, you may be considering ways to deliver routine rheumatologic care via some form of telemedicine. Here are some of the legal considerations.

    Practicing Telemedicine Raises Legal Considerations for Rheumatologists

    July 12, 2016

    With the evolution and advancement of technology, it was only a matter of time before such changes affected the medical industry. Although the concept of telemedicine dates back more than 50 years, emphasis on cost-effective quality healthcare coupled with technological advancements has caused a resurgence of telemedicine in recent years. What constitutes telemedicine largely depends…

    Some Telemedicine Barriers Are Down During COVID-19 Pandemic

    May 15, 2020

    Telerheumatology—which refers to the application of electronic communication technology to clinical encounters from a distance between rheumatologists and their patients—has the potential to extend a workforce projected to experience significant shortfalls, making it more accessible to more patients. Multiple barriers that stood in the way of taking full advantage of this promise are now down—at…

    Telemedicine & Fellowship Education After COVID-19: Q&A with Kanika Monga, MD

    July 14, 2020

    The COVID-19 pandemic is reshaping clinical rheumatology and the fellowship experience. Rheumatology education should include how to triage patients for remote visits, says second-year fellow Kanika Monga, MD…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences