Video: Knock on Wood| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-youtube-playfa-rss

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Lupus Nephritis
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Ethics Forum: Plagiarism in EMRs Saves Time, But Can Raise Risk of Errors

Jane S. Kang, MD, & Robert H. Shmerling, MD  |  Issue: June 2015  |  June 15, 2015

Back to the Case

Upon recognizing the discrepancy regarding which knee was replaced, you issue an addendum to your initial note. You forward this addendum to the resident who had copied large parts of your note with a gentle reminder regarding the perils of copying and pasting. Although the patient in this case suffered no harm from the cutting and pasting of medical documentation, that may not be true the next time.


Jane S. Kang, MD, is an assistant professor of medicine and program director of the Rheumatology Fellowship at Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian in New York. She is completing a Masters of Bioethics at Columbia University.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Robert H. Shmerling, MD, is the clinical chief of rheumatology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston and the chair of the ACR’s Committee on Ethics and Conflict of Interest.

Editor’s Note

If you have comments or questions about this case, or if you have a case that you’d like to see in Ethics Forum, e-mail us at [email protected].

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

 

References

  1. Hammond KW, Helbig ST, Benson CC, et al. Are electronic medical records trustworthy? Observations on copying, pasting and duplication. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;269–273.
  2. Weir CR, Hurdle JF, Felgar MA, et al. Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors. Methods Inf Med. 2003;42(1):61–67.
  3. O’Donnell HC, Kaushal R, Barron Y, et al. Physicians’ attitudes towards copy and pasting in electronic note writing. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jan;24(1):63–68.
  4. Thornton DJ, Schold JD, Venkateshaiah L, et al. The prevalence of copied information by attendings and residents in critical care progress notes. Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):382–388.
  5. Letter from Obama administration on hospital billing. The New York Times. 2012 Sep 24.
  6. AMA Code of Medical Ethics. Opinion 9.132—Health Care Fraud and Abuse.
  7. Adler-Milstein J, Jha AK. No evidence found that hospitals are using new electronic health records to increase Medicare reimbursements. Health Aff. 2014 Jul;33(7):1271–1277.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EthicsProfessional TopicsTechnology Tagged with:Electronic medical recordsmedical errorsplagiarismTechnology

Related Articles

    Electronic Health Record Documentation Guidelines

    January 19, 2018

    The operations management team in healthcare practices is expected to have an effective coding compliance program in place that is continually evaluated and reevaluated. To accurately assess the program’s effectiveness, several outcome indicators must be measured, including error rates in the provider’s documentation and the electronic health record (EHR). Due to increased scrutiny by the…

    Rheuminations: Fraud Casts a Pall on Medical Research

    July 1, 2013

    The history, causes, and effects of scientific misconduct and strategies to reduce fraud and plagiarism in clinical medicine

    Administrators & Payers Have Hijacked Our Medical Records

    October 18, 2018

    I attended medical school in the 1960s, when Dr. Lawrence Weed reinvented the medical record to organize and leverage the physician’s patient evaluation for clarity and quality of care—what he dubbed “the problem-oriented medical record.”1,2 My internal medicine house officer training at Massachusetts General placed a high value on efficient, effective medical records and communication…

    Avoid Errors: Insights into Ensuring Accurate Data in EHRs

    May 22, 2018

    With the increasing use of electronic health records and quality measure reporting requirements, data collection has become crucial for rheumatologists. But how do clinicians prevent human error and ensure data accuracy?

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-youtube-playfa-rss
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences