Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

The Rheumatology Clinical Registry Is Now Open for Reporting

  |  

The Rheumatology Clinical Registry (RCR) is open for reporting. As we are approaching the end of the 2017 MIPS performance year, however, keep in mind that to report via the RCR, your last date to enter patient information will be Jan. 15, 2018.
You can access the RCR’s updated dashboard here. Remember to use your previous login credentials. The dashboard is a tool used for quality reporting purposes and allows rheumatologists to demonstrate the quality of their care to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The new dashboard will give you an estimated MIPS composite score and can help you avoid a negative payment adjustment in 2018. Note: This RCR dashboard scoring is an estimate and cannot guarantee the type of future payment adjustment; only CMS can determine penalties and bonuses.

For more information or help with the RCR email ACR registry staff at [email protected].

ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Related Articles

    RISE Dashboard Updates Help Users Report 2018 MIPS Data

    As the year begins to wind down, Zach McMurray is gearing up for 2018 MIPS reporting. Despite the “always changing and usually confusing landscape of MACRA/MIPS,” he says his practice isn’t worried because it uses the ACR’s Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) qualified clinical data registry. Mr. McMurray is director of clinical information systems…

    I Have the Data—Now What?

    Rheumatologists practicing in the current healthcare environment are experiencing unprecedented information flow, data management issues, and a rise in quality designations and pay-for-performance incentive programs. There is increasing pressure on rheumatologists to document or capture treatment concordance with guideline recommendations and best practices and to monitor gaps in care and patient outcomes. Unfortunately, some quality programs are not considered clinically meaningful, and even those that are often bring administrative burdens related to reporting, data aggregation, and analysis.