Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Round One for PQRI

Kurt Ullman  |  Issue: July 2009  |  July 1, 2009

Those using paper medical records found they had to build redundancies into their practice. Some indicators only had to be addressed yearly. However, there was often no easy way to confirm completion. This meant that physicians conforming to PQRI’s requirements had to go over indicators each time a patient was seen to ensure they were covered at least once.

Report Structure Concerns

The structure of the reports also proved to be problematic. “One indicator was whether a patient with osteoporosis had had a DEXA test recently,” says Karen Kolba, MD, a rheumatologist in solo practice in Santa Maria, Calif. “Instead of just yes or no, there were a number of modifiers. To accurately answer the question, we had to track down whether the patient had a bone density study elsewhere and confirm the results.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Even those practices with computerized medical records found integrating the requirements of reporting with their particular program challenging. The frustration level for many practices increased after the first year of reporting ended on December 31, 2007. Payments were delayed until the second half of 2008. Many physicians not only did not get their payment, but also were unable to find out why. For others, bonus checks were far smaller than anticipated. The MGMA report found that as of August 2008, 29.6% of those responding say they did not know if their practice had earned a bonus. An additional 8.6% had been turned down.

Dr. Flood says he was in the dark on his bonus for several months. Then, a check appeared from CMS with no explanation of what it was for. It took more time to confirm the money was due to him before cashing the check.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“I did not get the bonus, and to this day, I don’t know why,” says Dr. Kolba. “Despite the best efforts of several employees, including my information technology expert, I just wasn’t able to penetrate the Web site and finally gave up.” She wasn’t alone, according to MGMA. Approximately one in four respondents (28.8%) had attempted to access the report and gave up due to difficulties. Around 70% rated accessing the feedback report as extremely or considerably difficult.

Even those able to fight through the Web site protections to get to the data were still left in the dark. “Once you got the data, it was hard to figure out your deficiencies,” says Dr. Baraf. “There was no way to go back and look at the paperwork to see if you were having problems with coding, linking a measure to a diagnosis, or other areas. Typically you get information from CMS on denied claims, but this was totally opaque.”

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legislation & Advocacy Tagged with:Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)DEXA scanMedicarePQRIPractice

Related Articles

    Practice Page: What PQRI Means to Rheumatologists

    November 1, 2010

    The Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PRQI) is a voluntary quality reporting program initiated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in 2007. CMS provides bonus payments to eligible providers who successfully report on applicable PQRI measures. For 2010, rheumatologists who successfully participate in PQRI can earn an incentive payment of 2% of the…

    Practical Advice for the Rheumatologist on Medicare PQRI

    July 1, 2009

    It is not too late to participate in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) 2009 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PRQI). Participation is voluntary, but providers who participate now will better prepare themselves for probable future reporting requirements while qualifying for an incentive payment from CMS.

    The Quality Movement Explained

    July 1, 2007

    “To Err is Human,” published by the Institute of Medicine in 1999, set off a firestorm of quality initiatives when it announced that at least 44,000 to 98,000 people die in hospitals every year because of medical errors. The first quality initiatives, which were aimed at hospitals, have now trickled down to physician practices. For two years there have been reports of payors moving to a pay-for-performance system or value-based purchasing.

    PQRI Now Includes RA Measures Group

    May 1, 2009

    In 2008, the only Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) measure that applied to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy. For 2009, five new RA measures were included, for a total of six measures in the new RA Measures Group. The five new measures were developed in 2008 by the National Committee for Quality Assurance in collaboration with the ACR and the American Medical Association’s Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement and were subsequently adopted by Medicare.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences