Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Subcutaneous CT-P13 Injection Evaluated for Safety & Efficacy of in RA Patients

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP  |  Issue: August 2019  |  July 22, 2019

MADRID—A one-year study presented during the 2019 European Congress of Rheumatology (EULAR), June 12–15, evaluated the efficacy and safety of CT-P13, which is biosimilar to infliximab, given as a subcutaneous injection in patients (N=50) with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).1

Initially, study patients received CT-P13 intravenously at Weeks 0 and 2. Patients (n=48) were then randomized into four groups to receive either 3 mg/kg of intravenous (IV) CT-P13 every eight weeks, 90 mg of subcutaneous CT-P13 every two weeks, 120 mg of subcutaneous CT-P13 every two weeks or 180 mg of subcutaneous CT-P13 every two weeks. Each group received treatment through Week 54. Effectiveness was assessed with the Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) and ACR20 scores. Pharmacokinetic studies, including drug levels, were conducted using blood samples collected prior to the administration of CT-P13 and at every study visit.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

All CT-P13 subcutaneous dosing regimens were comparable in efficacy to the IV CT-P13 regimen, and comparable DAS28-CRP and ACR20 response rates. The mean serum concentration in all patients treated with subcutaneous CT-P13 surpassed the target therapeutic concentration limit.

No new safety signals were identified during this study. Additionally, the safety profile of subcutaneous CT-P13 was similar to that for patients who received IV CT-P13 and IV infliximab. Injection site reactions were either grade 1 or 2, and no malignancies or deaths were reported.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Results from this one-year study suggest the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous CT-P13 is similar to that of IV CT-P13 in RA patients. Thus, using a subcutaneous formulation of CT-P13 may improve treatment options for patients already using the biosimilar, providing more than adequate levels of drug for treatment.


Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP, is a freelance medical writer based in New York City and a pharmacist at New York Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital.

Reference

  1. Yoo DH, Jaworski J, Matyska-Piekarsa E, et al. A novel formulation of CT-P13 (infliximab biosimilar) for subcutaneous administration: 1-year results from a part 1 phase 1/3 randomized controlled trial in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(suppl 2):A733.

Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsDrug UpdatesEULAR/OtherMeeting Reports Tagged with:CT-P13EULARinfliximabRheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Related Articles

    Possible Impact of Biosimilar Infliximab on U.S. Market in Prescriptions, Pricing

    September 8, 2016

    The use of biosimilars for rheuma­tology in the U.S. became a reality when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb), a biosimilar to Remicade (infliximab), in April. What this may mean is increased competition among drug companies with regard to pricing and, therefore, potentially lower costs for U.S. patients, according to Seoyoung…

    Study Says 1 Biosimilar Switch Is OK; Jury Still Out on Multiple Switches

    August 17, 2018

    AMSTERDAM—As more biosimilar drugs for rheumatic diseases make their way to market, evidence is growing that switching from the originator drug to a biosimilar tends to be effective, while the questions of switching back and forth, and switching multiple times using several different biosimilars, remain to be answered, an expert on the topic said at…

    Mucosal Healing Seen with Infliximab Biosimilar CT-P13 in Ulcerative Colitis

    May 3, 2016

    NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—About two-thirds of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) had mucosal healing by the end of induction treatment with the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13, according to results of the first prospective study to evaluate this. CT-P13 is the first biosimilar monoclonal antibody of reference infliximab (Remicade) approved in Europe and several other countries where…

    Should Patients with Rheumatic Disease Switch from Biologic to Biosimilar?

    January 19, 2018

    SAN DIEGO—Should patients with rheumatic diseases switch from a biologic to its biosimilar? At the 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting’s Great Debate, held Nov. 5, two rheumatologists argued whether to switch or stay put based on safety, efficacy and potential cost savings. First to the podium to make the case for switching, Jonathan Kay, MD, tweaked…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences