Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Take the Reins

Neal S. Birnbaum, MD  |  Issue: November 2006  |  November 1, 2006

Neal S. Birnbaum, MD

Among physicians these days, introducing the subject of quality and the entity known as the quality movement is a bit like talking about U.S. politics: There are a wide range of views. When the subject of quality is raised, there are the “true believers” who think the quality movement is the only option to standardize and improve medical care in the United States while addressing the reality of spiraling healthcare costs, and there are the “hard skeptics” who are convinced that the quality movement is just another scheme to squeeze more out of already embattled clinicians and restrict treatment options to the cheapest alternatives. Many members fall somewhere between the two ends of the spectrum.

A recent poll of ACR members on the quality movement found that these broad views are reflected by our membership. It’s not difficult to see why some physicians would be skeptical. The worthwhile aims of the quality movement may appear at odds with those of its big endorsers such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and private insurance—especially from the perspective of a community-based, small-practice clinician. Invariably, among clinicians, the discussion turns to pay-for-performance (P4P) and horror stories of incentive systems that mutated into penalty systems based on arbitrary assessments of “quality of care.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Expand the Quality Discussion

If we engage in the quality movement in the right way and help to steer its adoption appropriately, we will improve the care of rheumatology patients.

In a way, it’s unfortunate that discussions of quality are often reduced to discussions of one or two implementation tactics such as P4P and physician rankings because there is great potential to use this movement to promote improvement in care for chronically ill patients. On the other hand, realities such as P4P do make clinicians sit up and take notice of the quality issue that will have a profound influence on how medicine is practiced in the United States in the not too distant future (in fact, it’s already here in some regions).

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

For some time, the ACR has been monitoring the emergence of the quality movement and planning the College’s representation of the rheumatology community within the quality sphere. We have embarked on a long-term initiative to develop quality performance indicators for rheumatologic disease. This will ensure that our members will be measured on provision of care that is based on judicious review of scientific evidence by rheumatology experts. We have built into this initiative several complementary activities. This will ensure that the interests and positions of rheumatologists are represented when discussions around implementation, adoption, and enforcement of quality programs take place.

We continue to believe that if we engage in the quality movement in the right way and help to steer its adoption appropriately, we will improve the care of rheumatology patients without penalizing rheumatologists financially.

In our member poll, we received some important feedback. First, members wholeheartedly support the ACR’s position that, by virtue of the expertise of its membership in studying and treating rheumatic disease, the College is the entity that should be leading the quality effort on behalf of rheumatology patients and those who care for them.

Draw on the Voice of Experience

Speak OUT!

Do you want to write a guest editorial for The Rheumatologist? Send your column idea to us at [email protected]. Please include your full name, credentials/title, a daytime phone number, and an e-mail address in case we need to contact you.

The second piece of feedback—perhaps the most important at this juncture—is that our members look to the ACR to inform and educate them on how the quality movement is taking hold and entering into our practices. In this issue of The Rheumatologist, we have provided the perspectives of four rheumatologists who have lived with quality for a while now. (See “Control Quality Anxiety,” page 24). Each of them has had different experiences, which have informed their perspectives and given them a strong appreciation for the benefits and risks associated with quality.

We are lucky to have these rheumatologists among our band of volunteers who are actively participating in the committees and subcommittees that guide our quality-related initiatives. Importantly, these volunteers represent our general ACR membership. They represent the perspectives of community-based rheumatologists (large and small), academic rheumatologists, and those working in hospital-based systems.

As you read their opinions, I’m sure you will appreciate that, while the ACR believes the quality movement will reduce gaps in disparity of care and improve treatment for patients with rheumatologic disease, our committee members are also cognizant of members’ concerns. In addition to developing quality indicators, guidelines, and treatment algorithms, ACR quality activities are designed to provide support to all rheumatologists. ACR is addressing the business issues, such as the price tag of systems, data entry burdens, pressure from payers, and conflicts between cost and quality care.

Ultimately, we know that our members’ primary concern is for their patients and we are determined to promote and defend the ability of rheumatologists to provide quality care to their patients.

We look forward to bringing you more information about the quality movement and the ACR’s involvement in it in future issues of The Rheumatologist, as well as through other ACR communication lines.

Dr. Birnbaum is president-elect of ACR.

Page: 1 2 3 | Multi-Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice SupportPresident's PerspectiveProfessional TopicsQuality Assurance/Improvement Tagged with:PatientsPay-for-PerformanceQuality

Related Articles

    Rheumatology Stakeholders Talk Quality

    December 1, 2007

    ACR urged to accelerate efforts to develop quality indicators

    Technology and Pay-for-Performance

    March 1, 2010

    Medicare and private payers are increasingly developing programs to reward physicians based on clinical benchmarks. As more payers embrace this approach, practices are looking to technology to help them manage complex reporting requirements.

    Control Quality Anxiety

    November 1, 2006

    Rheumatologists positive but cautious about their brushes with the quality movement

    Measuring Quality of Care Is Here to Stay—and the ACR Can Help

    January 1, 2009

    Imagine a patient comes into your office with active RA or lupus. You diagnose her and prescribe medications for her active disease—rash, arthritis, and so forth—but you do nothing to address possible long-term complications. You don’t prescribe calcium or vitamin D to prevent osteoporosis, you don’t get a bone density scan, and you don’t order labs to check risk factors for heart disease.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences