Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Tofacitinib with Methotrexate Not Inferior to Adalimumab with Methotrexate

Thomas R. Collins  |  July 13, 2017

Highlights from the 2017 EULAR Congress

MADRID—Tofacitinib (a JAK inhibitor) used with methotrexate (MTX) is not inferior to adalimumab (a TNF inhibitor) plus MTX in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who’ve had an inadequate response to MTX alone, according to results of a Phase 3B/4 trial presented in a session at the Annual European Congress of Rheumatology (EULAR).

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The findings came in a one-year trial, called the ORAL Strategy, with three active treatment arms, meant to compare tofacitinib alone with tofacitinib plus MTX, tofacinitib alone with adalimumab plus MTX, and tofacitinib plus MTX with adalimumab plus MTX (see Table 1, below).1

Table 1: ORAL Strategy

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
Enrollment: 1132
Study Start Date: August 2014
Study Completion Date: December 2016
Primary Completion Date: December 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily with methotrexate Drug: Tofacitinib with methotrexate
Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, oral for 12 months
Methotrexate (previous stable dose 15–25 mg) every week, oral for 12 months
Placebo for adalimumab every other week, subcutaneous for 12 months
Experimental: Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily monotherapy Drug: Tofacitinib without methotrexate
Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, oral for 12 months
Placebo for methotrexate (previous stable dose) every week, oral for 12 months
Placebo for adalimumab every other week, subcutaneous for 12 months
Active Comparator: Adalimumab with methotrexate Biological: Adalimumab with methotrexate; Placebo for tofacitinib twice daily, oral for 12 months
Methotrexate (previous stable dose 15–25 mg) every week, oral for 12 months
Adalimumab 40 mg every other week, subcutaneous for 12 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02187055

In the other comparisons, performed using an efficacy threshold derived from a meta-analysis of adalimumab trials, tofacitinib alone landed in a kind of statistical limbo when compared with adalimumab plus MTX: It wasn’t shown to be worse, nor was it shown to be superior. The same was found for tofacitinib alone compared with tofacitinib plus MTX.

The main point of the trial was to settle remaining questions from tofacitinib’s Phase 3 trial, which suggested that perhaps tofacitinib alone was better than tofacitinib with MTX—which was found not to be true in this trial—and that tofacitinib with MTX was better than adalimumab.

The Trial

One thousand one hundred and forty-six patients were randomized: 384 were treated with 5 mg tofacitinib monotherapy orally twice a day, 5 mg tofacitinib twice a day plus MTX or adalimumab plus MTX.

There was no significant difference between the groups, with 46% of the tofacitinib plus MTX patients achieving an ACR50 response after six months, compared with 43.8% of adalimumab plus MTX patients and 38.3% of the tofacitinib-alone patients. In a subsequent analysis, tofacitinib plus MTX was not found to be superior to adalimumab plus MTX.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Drug UpdatesMeeting Reports Tagged with:EULAR

Related Articles

    Effectiveness of Tofacitinib with Methotrexate, Adalimumab Therapy Evaluated in Patients with RA

    September 19, 2017

    MADRID—Tofacitinib (a JAK inhibitor) used with methotrexate (MTX) is not inferior to adalimumab (a TNF inhibitor) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who’ve had an inadequate response to MTX alone, according to results of a Phase 3B/4 trial presented in a session at the Annual European Congress of Rheumatology (EULAR). The findings came in a one-year…

    A&R Abstracts: Methotrexate

    November 1, 2011

    For further reading

    Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance, Part 3: Rheumatoid Arthritis

    August 16, 2019

    Over the past few years, bio­similars and other new drugs have been introduced to treat rheumatic illnesses. Some of the conditions we treat have numerous drug options, others have few or only off-label options. This series, “Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance,” provides streamlined information on the administration of biologic, biosimilar and small molecule inhibitor drugs…

    Reading Rheum

    April 1, 2009

    Handpicked Reviews of Contemporary Literature

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences