Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Triple Therapy with Methotrexate Effective, Cheaper in RA

Larry Hand  |  April 27, 2016

“Many patients, particularly in the U.S., proceed to biologic therapy after failure of methotrexate alone. Our review challenges this approach,” Dr. Hazlewood told Reuters Health.

“Any systematic review summarizes average treatment effects,” he continued. “These choices are often complex and need to be tailored to a patients’ disease activity and preferences. This should occur through a shared discussion with the patient and his or her rheumatologist.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The Arthur J.E. Child chair in rheumatology outcomes research partially supported this research.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsDrug UpdatesRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:BiologicsHYDROXYCHLOROQUINEMethotrexateRheumatoid Arthritis (RA)sulphasalazinetriple therapy

Related Articles
    Shidlovski / shutterstock.com

    Studies Suggest Similar Risks for Biologics vs. Conventional Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis

    May 15, 2020

    Two new studies delving into the relative safety of biologic drugs prescribed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have concluded that real-world applications of abatacept and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi’s) are comparable to more conventional therapies in their associated risk of serious infections. Triple Therapy One study, in Arthritis Care & Research, found the risk of…

    A Dual Inhibitor Treatment for RA?

    July 17, 2023

    TLL-018, a Janus kinase 1/tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, proved more effective for treating patients with RA than tofacitinib, according to a study by Zeng et al.

    Tofacitinib with Methotrexate Not Inferior to Adalimumab with Methotrexate

    July 13, 2017

    Highlights from the 2017 EULAR Congress MADRID—Tofacitinib (a JAK inhibitor) used with methotrexate (MTX) is not inferior to adalimumab (a TNF inhibitor) plus MTX in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who’ve had an inadequate response to MTX alone, according to results of a Phase 3B/4 trial presented in a session at the Annual European Congress of…

    Old Drugs Can Learn New Tricks

    November 1, 2011

    Methotrexate and its mechanism of action

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences