Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Potentially Dampens Diversity

Vanessa Caceres  |  Issue: November 2023  |  October 9, 2023

Although this ruling focused on race and ethnicity, rheumatologists interviewed for this story point out that other types of diversity are also important to admissions considerations, such as diversity in gender, geographic location (e.g., rural vs. urban) and whether a candidate has immigrant parents.

Dr. Helfgott

However, Simon M. Helfgott, MD, director of education and fellowship training in the Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation and Immunity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and a former physician editor of The Rheumatologist, points out the Supreme Court ruling could have less of an impact than some think, at least when it comes to evaluating fellowship candidates. He has already seen a trend of candidates revealing less personal information in their applications, making the selection process more challenging for fellowship programs. As a result, he says, he will focus on personal statements, where their residency was completed and feedback from the residency director to get a fuller picture of potential candidates.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Carving Out Diversity as a Priority

Although the impact of the Supreme Court decision continues to evolve and may take years to work its way through the admissions system, rheumatologists are already looking ahead for ways to increase diversity among candidates and encourage fellows to embrace diversity. Here are some of their ideas:

1. Educate medical students about rheumatology. “A medical student, regardless of their background, can’t think about a field if they’ve never interacted with physicians in that field,” Dr. Wright says. Lectures, rotations and programs that connect undergraduate or medical students with rheumatology can expand awareness of what the specialty offers.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

When taking part in such sessions, Dr. Wright hears some common questions: What does a rheumatologist do? What do you find most rewarding? What’s your day-to-day work experience? Some students come away with a greater interest in the specialty and stay in touch with her.

Introducing rheumatology as a potential career option could even begin during elementary and high school years, Dr. Blazer says.

2. Reach out to schools or programs that serve those under-represented in medicine. Partnerships and educational programs geared toward historically Black colleges and universities can create a pipeline of clinical talent that could make its way into rheumatology, says Beth L. Jonas, MD, FACR, Reeves Foundation Distinguished Professor of Medicine and chief of the Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill. Dr. Jonas is also a member of the ACR Workforce Solutions Steering Committee.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legislation & AdvocacyWorkforce Tagged with:DiversityWorkforce

Related Articles

    The Impact of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions on Medical Affairs, Healthcare Policy

    October 11, 2016

    As America’s capital, Washington, D.C., maintains an outsized influence in our daily lives. Despite having a meager sliver of the New York City population, the daily political transactions that transpire in the District of Columbia impact our lives. The comings and goings in the corridors of Congress are likely to have a greater impact on us…

    Gorodenkoff / shutterstock.com

    The NIAMS Diversity Supplement Program Offers Researcher Funding

    January 10, 2022

    The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) is a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) that supports research into the causes, treatment and prevention of arthritis and musculoskeletal and skin diseases, as well as the training of basic and clinical scientists to carry out this research. NIAMS recognizes the…

    G-Stock Studio / shutterstock.com

    Conquering Systemic Racism in Medicine

    October 19, 2020

    2020 has not only borne witness to a global pandemic, but also to increasing fervor in the fight for racial equity. In a wave of opposition to the systemic racism in the U.S., people have been in the streets demonstrating and protesting against social injustice and have taken to social media to promote political action….

    U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Obamacare Insurance Subsidies

    June 25, 2015

    WASHINGTON (Reuters)—The U.S. Supreme Court preserved President Barack Obama’s signature healthcare law on Thursday, upholding crucial tax subsidies while turning aside a conservative legal challenge that could have doomed the law. “After more than 50 votes in Congress to repeal or weaken this law, after a presidential election based in part on preserving or repealing…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences