Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Updates on JAK Inhibitor Safety, COVID-19 Vaccination in Immunosuppressed Patients & More

Jeffrey Curtis, MD, MS, MPH  |  Issue: January 2022  |  December 7, 2021

Jeffrey Curtis, MD, MS, MPH

Dr. Jeffrey Curtis

ACR CONVERGENCE 2021—The ACR Convergence 2021 meeting reflected the continued advancement of science and practical research in the field of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Among the most important topics this year in RA was the evolution of the risk-benefit profile of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, for which new safety data emerged in a series of related abstracts.

JAK RESEARCH

Results from the recently completed, worldwide, randomized, head-to-head comparison of a JAK inhibitor therapy (tofacitinib) vs. tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor therapy, adalimumab or etanercept, were reported in a series of four important presentations.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Abstract 0831: Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib vs TNF inhibitors in RA patients aged 50 years or older with one or more cardiovascular risks: Results from a phase 3b/4 randomized safety trial

Research by Ytterberg SR, et al.1

The comparative safety of JAK inhibitor therapy on the pre-specified outcomes of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and malignancy from the Oral Surveillance trial were unveiled for the first time. This trial fulfilled a regulatory requirement and was designed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of tofacitinib compared with adalimumab (in North America) or etanercept (in the rest of the world) in 4,362 patients randomized to tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily, 5 mg twice daily, or TNF inhibitor therapy.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

For both MACE and malignancy outcomes, tofacitinib failed to meet the pre-specified non-inferiority outcomes. The risk (hazard ratio) of MACE events was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91, 1.94) in tofacitinib-treated patients, a non-significant result that failed to meet the non-inferiority margin of 1.8. For malignancies, the risk was 1.48 (95% CI 1.04, 2.00), consistent with a significantly increased risk. The number of patients needed to be treated with tofacitinib for one year to result in one extra MACE event or malignancy (i.e., the number needed to harm; NNH) was 567 for MACE and 276 for malignancy.

These unexpected results had important implications from both a regulatory and practical perspective, and led to a label change the first week of December 2021 in the prescribing indications for tofacitinib and upadacitinib. These and existing JAK inhibitor therapies (e.g., baricitinib) for RA are now indicated only for patients who have failed at least one TNF inhibitor. New and updated Boxed Warnings in the revised label relate to further information outlined in the related abstracts below.

Abstract 0958: Risk factors for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients aged ≥50 years with RA and ≥1 additional cardiovascular risk factor: Results from a phase 3b/4 randomized safety study of tofacitinib vs TNF inhibitors2

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ACR ConvergenceConditionsMeeting ReportsResearch RheumRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:ACR Convergence 2021ACR Convergence 2021 – RA

Related Articles

    The End of the Beginning: COVID-19 Vaccines & Other Conundrums

    December 9, 2020

    “It’s like winning Powerball.” For months, there has been a steady trickle of questions from my patients, asking for my opinion about the new vaccines being developed to prevent COVID-19. More to the point, they want to know if they should be vaccinated. ad goes here:advert-1ADVERTISEMENTSCROLL TO CONTINUEAfter some fits and starts, I finally struck…

    Vaccine Hesitancy: Wariness Is Rare, But There’s a Wider Worry About COVID Vaccines’ Efficacy in Some Populations

    July 6, 2021

    Hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccination persists nationwide, although it varies among regions and sociodemographic groups.

    ACR Convergence 2020

    ACR Convergence 2020: Progress Toward COVID-19 Vaccines

    November 11, 2020

    ACR CONVERGENCE 2020—A scientific session on Sunday, Nov. 8, focused on vaccine prospects in COVID-19. Dan Barouch, MD, PhD, director of the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and the William Bosworth Castle Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston, shared his insights about vaccine development across…

    Space & Other Races

    October 19, 2020

    On April 5, 1950, a small group of scientists met in Silver Spring, Md., to talk about geophysics. I know this is not the most riveting way to start, but if you stick with me, I promise the story will get much more interesting. ad goes here:advert-1ADVERTISEMENTSCROLL TO CONTINUEThis group of scientists met to discuss…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences