Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Ethics Forum: Who Did You Vote For? Is a Discussion of Politics in the Medical Office the Taboo It Once Was?

Margaret Tsai, MD  |  Issue: January 2021  |  January 6, 2021

Either way, my long office day is likely to be even longer, and the conversation is likely to become intense.

My choice: I chose to discuss the importance of voting with my patient and was completely honest about my vote.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

A Broader View

After work, I asked my colleagues what their response would have been, and I was very surprised by their answers. Many of my colleagues said they were apolitical and did not vote; thus, politics is a non-issue/topic during their patient interactions. This led me to wonder whether this was true for doctors across the country.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

A 2007 article, “Do Doctor’s Vote?” by David Grande, MD, MPA, David A. Asch, MD, MBA, and Katrina Armstrong, MD, MSCE, analyzed U.S. voting participation from 1993–2002, and showed that lawyers and the general population vote more often than physicians.1 The article also noted this trend has been consistent since the late 1970s.

Voting is a clear demonstration of civic responsibility and community engagement. There are several possible reasons why health professionals may choose not to vote: busy schedules, lack of interest, disengagement, burnout, lack of confidence in the process, a belief their vote won’t make a difference, etc. These arguments against voting would be no different from other members of the general population.

Perhaps health professionals are making a choice to keep healthcare apolitical by aligning with neither side, something that has been very difficult over the past few months.

I would argue that voting is a privilege, and I have voted every year since college.

Healthcare policy is a critical issue politically, and voting for necessary changes should be an important priority and opportunity for our profession. Our practices are affected. And our position gives us a special understanding of how our patients live with the consequences of politically motivated legislation.

Physicians pride ourselves on our professionalism and commitment to our patients. Advocacy remains a core milestone during training. This is another way for us to make a difference for our patients, communities and country.

A Right & a Privilege

The 2020 U.S. election had record voter engagement. By the time this article is printed, all the ballots will have been counted, and we will be preparing for the inauguration. So whether or not you choose to discuss these delicate topics with your patients, keeping in mind the challenges outlined above, it is critical for us to participate in the political process. We may not support the same candidates or issues, but we all have the right and privilege to vote based on our beliefs. It is paramount that each citizen, doctors included, exercise this privilege.


Margaret Tsai, MD, is an associate staff member in the Department for Rheumatic and Immunologic Disease, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio. She is a current member of the ACR Committee on Ethics & Conflicts of Interest.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EthicsPractice SupportProfessional Topics Tagged with:communicationEthicsEthics ForumPolitics

Related Articles

    Every Vote Counts

    September 11, 2020

    It came down to the toss of a coin. David Yancey represented the Newport News district in the Virginia House of Delegates beginning in 2011. In 2017, he had a challenger. Shelly Simonds, a member of the local school board, decided to run for the privilege of representing the 94th District. The final tally: 11,608…

    Ethics Forum: Personal Ethics Questions Surrounding RheumPAC Donations

    October 14, 2015

    Imagine you’ve just heard a compelling presentation urging all ACR members to contribute to RheumPAC, the ACR’s political action committee. RheumPAC’s mission is to support politicians who support issues important to rheumatologists. You are impressed by the role RheumPAC has played in a number of issues you support. Just as you’re writing a check, you…

    Your Career’s Election Day

    November 1, 2011

    Voting for your future

    A Fork in the Road: Advocacy for Rheumatology

    July 10, 2012

    Is that fork bent? So you must be a rheumatologist.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences