In an online survey conducted in the spring of 2009, the ACR collected information on journal readership patterns, satisfaction, and content interests. The survey was sent to a sample of ACR and ARHP members who had not submitted manuscripts to Arthritis & Rheumatism (A&R) or Arthritis Care & Research (AC&R) within a recent 12-month period. It was also sent, with additional questions regarding submission and review, to all members and nonmembers who had submitted at least one manuscript to either journal during the 12-month period. Because of the international scope and reputation of the ACR journals, along with the fact that most members are in clinical practice and do not generally conduct and publish research, 63% of the submitters to the journals are not members of the ACR or ARHP. The ACR journals have long been viewed as the place where both members and nonmembers seek to publish their high-quality work.
A New Beginning
The growth of Arthritis Care & Research into an independent journal
Our Interdisciplinary Outlook
Rheumatologists and health professionals working together is one of our great strengths
Productive Partnership
The ACR and the REF work closely to support the future of rheumatology
Physician–Industry Relationships
The ACR’s strict ethical policy guides relationships with pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers
ACR/ARHP and REF Strategic Planning
Where are we going and how are we going to get there?
A New Focus of International Rheumatology
International collaboration through ILAR promotes health equity in rheumatology
Quality Advice from Specialty Societies
The ACR’s Quality Stakeholders’ Summit explored quality initiatives from several medical societies
Letters to the Editor
I read with interest Dr. Fox’s perspective in the June issue of The Rheumatologist [TR] regarding ghost writing in medical research. Dr. Fox is all for integrity in research (who isn’t?); nevertheless, he takes to task some of the people (Ross et al and the editors of the Journal of the American Medical Association [JAMA]) who write about the corrupting influence of industry on physicians, including those in academics [JAMA 2008;299(15):1800-1812]. Part of his motivation may be to defend members of ACR who have been involved in the activity of ghostwriting and guest editing. This approach may play well to readers of The Rheumatologist, but it would seem that Dr. Fox should address his concerns to the editors of JAMA. That way, the authors of the article could offer a rebuttal to Dr. Fox’s concerns and assertions, and we all could get closer to the truth about this important issue.
Let the ACR Help You Improve Your Practice
Today’s rheumatology practices face increasing internal and external pressures. Staffing effectiveness and efficiency, overhead increases, coding and billing issues, litigious employees, conflicts with colleagues, new competition, changing patient attitudes, new revenue constraints, and managed care contracting and compliance are just some of the pressures that constantly push practices to their limits.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- …
- 55
- Next Page »