Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Evidence Lacking for Tests for Psoriasis Patients Using Biologic Agents

Will Boggs, MD  |  July 25, 2015

NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—Various organizations recommend dozens of screening and monitoring tests for patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis who are using systemic biologic agents, despite sparse evidence to support any of them.

“At a population level, these medications have proven to be very safe and the evidence does not support such extensive and frequent testing in all patients,” Dr. William W. Huang, from Wake Forest School of Medicine, Center for Dermatology Research, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, told Reuters Health by email. “However, every case must be looked at individually based on the patient’s own risk profile.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Huang and colleagues reviewed 26 articles in their effort to assess the existing support for screening and monitoring with the use of currently available biologics.

Screening for tuberculosis, preferably using the interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) instead of tuberculin skin testing, was the only test with strong evidence to support it, and even its evidence was only grade B.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Grade C evidence supports screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, because of the concern for viral reactivation. Screening for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was also supported by grade C evidence. As a result, the researchers wrote, selective screening for HBV or HCV should be based on professional judgment and/or patient preference.

The researchers found insufficient evidence to support screening for HIV infection or to support screening complete blood counts, screening and monitoring antinuclear antibody, or following C-reactive protein levels, according to the July 14 Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology online report.

Grade C evidence supported the monitoring of hepatic function, which may be relevant among patients treated with infliximab.

“Although the evidence does not support current recommendations, provider habits are difficult to change and I do not foresee a change in the near future,” Dr. Huang said.

“Although testing may seem innocuous, there are risks associated with detecting false-positives, leading to additional testing, morbidity, and additional health care cost and resources,” the researchers wrote.

“As both private and public insurance carriers are looking more and more at cost-effective care, we have to examine the level of evidence to support the things we do in medicine,” Dr. Huang concluded.

Dr. Jensen Yeung, from the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, told Reuters Health by email, “Testing has already been diminished in psoriasis patients being treated with biologics. We used to perform blood work on patients at least every three months and some ordered a chest x-ray yearly. Many dermatologists are no longer monitoring these patients as frequently.”

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsConditionsDrug UpdatesPsoriatic Arthritis Tagged with:BiologicsinfliximabPsoriasisPsoriatic Arthritis

Related Articles
    MicroOne / shutterstock.com

    Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance, Part 2: Psoriasis

    May 17, 2019

    Over the past few years, bio­similars and other new drugs have been introduced to treat rheumatic illnesses. Some of the conditions we treat have numerous drug option; others have few or only off-label options. This series, “Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance,” provides streamlined information on the administration of biologic, biosimilar and other medications used to…

    Many Medications: Understanding the Biologic Management of Psoriasis

    June 15, 2023

    ORLANDO, FLORIDA — Given the intersection between rheumatology and dermatology for many patients with autoimmune diseases, it’s helpful to hear from specialists in both fields regarding disease management strategies.

    The Why & What of the ACR's Clinical Practice Guidelines

    The Why & What of the ACR’s Clinical Practice Guidelines

    February 18, 2018

    With the support of its membership, the ACR publishes clinical practice guidelines in multiple disease areas based on the best available clinical and scientific data. These aim to support health professionals treating rheumatology patients to give the best possible care. Like any set of medical guidelines, ACR guidelines are based on evidence of several different…

    The Pros & Cons of Combining Different Specialties Under One Roof

    July 19, 2018

    Many rheumatology patients have complex conditions and require the added expertise of colleagues in other fields, such as pulmonology, neurology or dermatology. This is even more true when patients with complex care issues are referred to academic medical centers. At such centers, patients often travel hours for an appointment and see more than one provider….

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences