Practice Page: The ACR’s Insurance Subcommittee Facilitates Better Communication With Health Insurers for Rheumatology Practices

The Insurance Subcommittee—Working For You!

ACR List Serve Open for Business

Join the insurance-coding list serve today! This forum is available for exchanging ideas and allows you to benefit from the experience, knowledge, and wisdom of your colleagues.

Ready to subscribe? Access all list serve forums to get started at

Dealing with the administrative requirements for health plans costs not only time, but also money for physicians and their practices. A 2009 study published in Health Affairs, “What Does It Cost Physician Practices to Interact with Health Insurance Plans?”, reported that physicians and their supportive staff spend approximately four or more hours each week interacting with insurance plans.1 Medical staff spends an increasing amount of time on the phone requesting prior authorizations, confirming medical necessity, completing redundant forms, and appealing denials for treatments. When time is converted to dollars, it is estimated that interactions with health plans cost practices between $23 billion and $31 billion each year.

In response to the growing challenges related to insurance companies, the Insurance Subcommittee (ISC) of the ACR Committee on Rheumatologic Care was created in 2009. The subcommittee’s purpose is to coordinate and engage in all activities that improve the practice environment of rheumatology as it is affected by health insurers. The committee works to improve patient access to treatment, support its members, and improve relationships with all stakeholders.

Rheumatologists want to be able to provide efficient care to their patients and to manage their workflow effectively. Coding and reimbursement issues create hurdles to achieving these goals. Practices face frustrations such as payment timeliness, procedural and service denials, claims edit, and claims accuracy. In addition, offices are burdened with an overwhelming volume of prior authorizations and confusing drug approval processes. Like their providers, the health insurance plans cannot afford to compromise patient care by limiting access to care or procedure choices. Thus, it is imperative that providers and payers improve their dialogue and find a middle ground on their common goal of providing excellent, affordable care.

The ISC hopes that coordinating meetings with key decision makers in health plans will promote an honest and candid dialogue regarding the needs and operational systems of both parties, with the expectation of streamlining administrative processes to reduce resource exhaustion and effectively deliver the right care to our patients.

Individual and system-wide insurance issues are among the many areas in which the ISC is working to develop policy and programs to assist ACR members in their interactions with health plans. ISC chair Elizabeth Perkins, MD, says, “The goal of the subcommittee is to build strong relationships with medical directors and policy makers to address our key issues. We want equal access to our medically necessary treatments, standardized prior authorizations, and an open, collaborative approach to efficient, affordable, quality healthcare. The ISC hopes to raise up rheumatologists, despite many of the strongholds weighing them down. We also believe the ACR needs to strengthen state-level [efforts] and legislative efforts, and better engage patients and others in the necessary reform ahead.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *