Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

What Rheumatologists Need to Know about Payer Audits

Steven M. Harris, Esq.  |  Issue: March 2016  |  March 15, 2016

Bacho/shutterstock.com

Bacho/shutterstock.com

Both government and private payers continue to aggressively monitor providers to prevent and recover overpayments. This is evidenced by the fact that the number of audits conducted in recent years has increased dramatically. A negative audit finding can result in the need to repay five- or seven-figure amounts.

Types of Audits

Private Payer Audits
Private payer audits take two forms: 1) informal reviews and 2) formal audits. These audits can be the result of actual allegations or evidence of non-compliance, or they can be random, in which general compliance is assessed. The procedure for such audits is typically determined by contract or the payer’s provider handbook and in accordance with applicable state law. Prepayment reviews may be conducted, in which the sufficiency of a claim—and its supporting documentation—is determined before payment is made to the provider. Post-payment reviews can also be performed, during which claims are analyzed after the provider has been paid to determine if an overpayment was made. If so, a recoupment will be sought from the provider.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Medicare Audits
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is the agency responsible for Medicare audits. These audits can take one of three forms:

  1. Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) audits—These typically focus on providers who provide high-cost items or services, have high volume and/or have atypical billing or coding practices.
  2. Recovery Audit Contractor’s Program (RAC) audits—These are performed by private contractors who are paid on a percentage of the amount of the improper payment discovered.
  3. Zone Program Integrity Contractor (ZPIC) audits—These are performed by CMS contractors and are the most serious of the three audit types. Contractors mine the provider’s data for compliance with Medicare coverage and coding policies and investigate fraud, and may prepare cases for civil or criminal referral to CMS or law enforcement agencies.

Medicaid Audits
Medicaid audits focus on compliance with both CMS and applicable state regulations, and investigate fraud. Any instances of fraud that are found will be reported to the state attorney general.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Audit Focus

The primary focus of audits in recent years has been medical necessity. Much of this audit activity is associated with payer concerns about specific fraud and abuse issues. Payers may be tipped off to such issues due to consistent billing by a provider for high volumes of certain high-level services, high volumes of evaluation and management services or by consistent referrals of patients for certain testing.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingLegal UpdatesPractice Support Tagged with:AuditsLegalMedicaidMedicarenoncompliancepayerphysician practicePractice Managementrheumatologist

Related Articles

    Different Payer Audits Require Different Preparation & Response

    June 21, 2018

    For a provider of healthcare services, payer audits are always a possibility. Both government and private payers consistently monitor providers to prevent fraud, overpayment, and improper billing or coding procedures. Audits can be nerve-racking and intimidating, even if a provider is billing correctly. Improper billing can lead to civil and criminal sanctions. To alleviate some…

    Understanding & Preparing for Payer Audits

    June 21, 2018

    Audit activity among Medicare and most third-party payers has increased in response to pressure to reduce healthcare costs. The return of billions of dollars to Medicare, Medicaid and third-party programs through these medical audit reviews has also increased. For example, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) 2014 Annual Report estimated that the Centers for Medicare &…

    Phase 2 of HIPAA Audit Program Launches

    May 13, 2016

    With many competing priorities facing physician practices, HIPAA compliance and security is not a topic that usually makes it to the top of the list. But this is not the case with the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (OCR), because it has initiated a new phase of audits of physician…

    Preparing for Increased HIPAA Audits Among Smaller Rheumatology Providers

    May 13, 2016

    Recent enforcement activities of the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (OCR) have shown an increase in fines and penalties assessed against smaller providers for failing to comply with the privacy, security and breach notification requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Historically, OCR has focused on larger…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences