Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

1% of U.S. Doctors Responsible for a Third of Malpractice Payments

Gene Emery  |  February 1, 2016

(Reuters Health)—Just one out of every 100 U.S. doctors is responsible for 32% of the malpractice claims that result in payments to patients, according to a comprehensive study of 15 years’ worth of cases.

And when a doctor has to pay out one claim, the chances are good that the same physician will soon be paying out on another, researchers reported online on Jan. 27 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“I think people will be surprised about the extent to which the claims are concentrated within a relatively small group of practitioners. It’s actually more concentrated than in earlier studies,” chief author David Studdert of Stanford University in California told Reuters Health.

The result, he said, demonstrates that there are practitioners who can accumulate large numbers of claims and continue to practice.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Earlier studies looked at malpractice claims that may or may not have had merit. This study looked at all cases in the National Practitioner Data Bank where payments were made.

Those other studies typically focused on a single insurer or a single state, and repeat offenders may have been able to avoid being tracked, by moving or switching insurers, Studdert said. “We have a kind of national all-encompassing window, so we should have been able to track the doctors wherever they go.”

Physicians in specialties, such as anesthesiology and neurology, have long been known to face an inherently higher risk for malpractice claims.

“This study rather convincingly shows, however, that even within specific specialties, malpractice claims are relatively concentrated and that a strong predictor of subsequent claims is a prior history of malpractice claims,” said Dr. Anupam Jena, associate professor of healthcare policy at Harvard Medical School in Boston, who was not connected to the research.

In addition, “this is the most comprehensive exploration of the hypothesis that individual physician malpractice risk may be predictable,” he told Reuters Health in an email. “To strengthen prediction, there are important factors that future analyses will hopefully consider such as patient volume, complexity of services provided, experience, and specifics on medical school, residency, and fellowship training.”

Studdert’s team analyzed 66,426 claims paid against 54,099 doctors from 2005 to 2014.

Nearly all were out-of-court settlements. Almost one third of the cases were sparked by a patient’s death. About 1% of physicians had at least two paid claims against them and those doctors accounted for 32% of paid claims.

One hundred twenty six doctors had more than five paid claims against them.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice SupportProfessional Topics Tagged with:malpracticeMedical MalpracticeNational Practitioner Data Bankpayment

Related Articles

    Malpractice Lawsuit Fear Provokes Defensive Medicine Response

    July 1, 2014

    Minimizing exposure to malpractice litigation has affected how physicians practice medicine

    What Gets a Good Rheumatologist Sued?

    November 1, 2007

    Pitfalls to avoid and habits that protect you from malpractice suits

    Stronger Malpractice Laws May Not Prevent Surgical Complications

    January 15, 2017

    (Reuters Health)—More aggressive malpractice climates don’t necessarily protect patients from surgical complications, a new study suggests. Supporters of medical malpractice laws that make it easier for patients to sue doctors say these protections are necessary to improve care. But in the current study, the risk of litigation didn’t translate into better outcomes, said study leader…

    Tail Insurance Protects Against Medical Malpractice Claims from Previous Jobs

    February 1, 2013

    Physicians who are resigning, retiring, switching jobs, or are terminated should consider tail insurance to cover malpractice claims brought after they’ve left their current employer

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences