Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

20 Years of RA Data: First-Line Biologic & Targeted Synthetic DMARD Trends

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP  |  September 1, 2021

EULAR—Over the past 20 years, a medical center in Ankara, Turkey, has collected data on the real-life treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which appear to be consistent with treatment guidelines. During EULAR 2021, June 2–5, Ali Ihsan Ertenli, MD, presented a study exploring the first-line biologic treatment trends for patients with RA at this medical center using data from the Hacettepe University Rheumatology Biologic Registry (HUR-BIO) from 2001–20.1

The registry captures biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) use and patient data related to demographics, disease and treatment, as well as adverse events experienced by these patients. Limited serologic data were also reported. Patients who began bDMARDs in 2005 were automatically registered for the study, and patients who commenced bDMARDs prior to 2005 were retrospectively registered.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The Data

The distribution of first-line biologic treatments was calculated in five-year increments, starting in 2001. By the end of 2020, 2,080 patients with RA were registered in HUR-BIO, mostly women (79.5%) with a mean age of 53.3±17.8 years when first prescribed a bDMARD. The rate of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide positivity was 61%, and the rate of rheumatoid factor positivity was 67.8%.

The rates of patients prescribed their first bDMARDs were:

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
  • 2% (n=65) from 2001–05;
  • 1% (n=335) from 2006–10;
  • 2% (n=858) from 2011–15; and
  • 5% (n=822) from 2016–20.

Multiple treatments were approved in Turkey during the study period: infliximab in 2003, etanercept in 2004, adalimumab in 2005, rituximab in 2009, abatacept in 2010, golimumab in 2013, tocilizumab in 2013, certolizumab in 2014 and tofacitinib in 2015.

The distribution of actual first-prescribed bDMARD treatments by five-year periods were:

  • 2001–05: 100% anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α agents (adalimumab: 23%; etanercept: 46%; infliximab: 31%);
  • 2006–10: 96.4% anti-TNF-α agents (adalimumab: 33%; etanercept: 46%; infliximab: 17%) and 4% rituximab;
  • 2011–15: 65% anti-TNF-α agents (adalimumab: 22%; etanercept: 27%; infliximab: 8%), 18% abatacept, 16% rituximab, 4% golimumab, 4% certolizumab, 1% tocilizumab, 0.7% tofacitinib; and
  • 2016–20: 40% anti-TNF-α agents (adalimumab: 19%; etanercept: 7%; infliximab: 1%), 26% tofacitinib, 12% tocilizumab, 12% abatacept, 10% rituximab, 8% certolizumab and 5% golimumab.

Etanercept was the most commonly prescribed anti-TNF-α agent. However, as time progressed, researchers found an increase in the use of non-anti-TNF-α bDMARDs, including a rise in the use of Janus kinase inhibitors (jakinibs) during the last five-years evaluated (2016–20).

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP, is a freelance medical writer based in New York City and a pharmacist at New York Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsDrug Updates Tagged with:biologic drugsEULARRheumatoid Arthritis (RA)trends

Related Articles

    Long-Term Benefits, Risks of Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs in Patients with RA

    December 19, 2017

    Two decades have passed since the first biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) was approved. Studies on the long-term use of biologics in different disease states, such as for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and malignancy, as well as for knee/hip replacement, reveal some encouraging news. In clinical trials, bDMARDs have been shown to increase the risk of…

    TNF Blockade for SLE

    September 1, 2010

    Reckless approach versus missed opportunity?

    Are We Playing It Safe?

    October 1, 2010

    Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition and the risk of solid malignancies

    Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance, Part 3: Rheumatoid Arthritis

    August 16, 2019

    Over the past few years, bio­similars and other new drugs have been introduced to treat rheumatic illnesses. Some of the conditions we treat have numerous drug options, others have few or only off-label options. This series, “Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance,” provides streamlined information on the administration of biologic, biosimilar and small molecule inhibitor drugs…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences