Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

A Delicate Balance: How to Avoid Overmedicalization in Rheumatology

Jason Liebowitz, MD, FACR  |  Issue: May 2024  |  April 9, 2024

We also have a tendency to overestimate benefit and underestimate harm, which is a common propensity among people in general. Doctors need to be aware of this bent. Beyond this, clinicians sometimes don’t understand the evidence. They may lack clinical epidemiology knowledge and crucial skills. When they don’t understand the evidence, they will be more accepting of evidence that supports their beliefs (i.e., confirmation bias) and will be too easily misled by, or susceptible to, unsupported claims. Physicians also tend to want to help patients by doing something, rather than just waiting.

TR: Can you discuss some of your work in reducing low-value care for low back pain around the world?

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Buchbinder: My very first large project when I returned to Australia was an evaluation of a mass media campaign for low back pain that was being planned by the state of Victoria’s workers’ compensation authority because of a huge rise in the cost of workers’ compensation for back pain in the preceding decade. The campaign was based on the provision of very simple messages: if you have back pain, stay active, self-manage, avoid unnecessary imaging and you can stay at work. The campaign was hugely successful in altering the beliefs of doctors and patients, and it also changed management and reduced costs significantly. It remains one of the most effective ways of addressing misconceptions about back pain and has been replicated around the world.10,11

Back pain is really just a part of everyday life, like the common cold, but the problem is that it has been overmedicalized, overinvestigated and overtreated. There are no easy ways of addressing this problem, and it needs a systems approach. My colleagues and I proposed to The Lancet a series about low back pain that would outline the problem and include a call to action to address it worldwide. The three-part series was published in 2018 and generated huge media attention; it also attracted notice from policymakers worldwide (as one example of reach, each of the three papers has been cited more than a thousand times).12-14 One outcome was that the World Health Organization (WHO) developed guidelines for the management of back pain that were released in December 2023, and some of the authors of the series—including me—were involved in their development.15

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

TR: How can individual rheumatologists think about these topics in their daily practice and help reduce the problems of misdiagnosis, overdiagnosis and waste in medicine?

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EthicsProfiles Tagged with:overmedicalizationpatient care

Related Articles

    Best Practices for Treating Non-Specific Low Back Pain

    December 16, 2015

    Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common reasons for physician appointments. However, treatment results remain suboptimal, resulting in high rates of chronic pain, narcotic usage, surgery, depression and disability—all at great cost to individuals and the nation. One reason for this is the current practice of grouping all low back pain patients…

    Insights on the Diagnosis & Treatment of Low Back & Hip Pain

    March 19, 2019

    CHICAGO—Two experts presented insights on the diagnosis and treatment of low back and hip pain, including a refresher course on the mechanical structures involved, in Anatomy in a Day: Demystifying Low Back Pain and Lateral Hip Pain: New Patho-Anatomical Perspectives, a session at the 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting. Low Back Pain Avoid using such terms…

    Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis

    October 7, 2011

    Out from the shadow of inflammation

    The Why & What of the ACR's Clinical Practice Guidelines

    The Why & What of the ACR’s Clinical Practice Guidelines

    February 18, 2018

    With the support of its membership, the ACR publishes clinical practice guidelines in multiple disease areas based on the best available clinical and scientific data. These aim to support health professionals treating rheumatology patients to give the best possible care. Like any set of medical guidelines, ACR guidelines are based on evidence of several different…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences