Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

A Fork in the Road: Advocacy for Rheumatology

Simon M. Helfgott, MD  |  Issue: July 2012  |  July 10, 2012

The Dirksen Building was built in the 1950s at a time when cost constraints precluded the incorporation of expensive ornaments or grand interiors into the construction plans. The building’s stone exterior façade, alternating with multi­story dark window columns, suggests an ornate interior. This prediction is quickly dispelled: upon entering through the heavy bronze doors situated at the building’s corners and walking into the exceedingly small and simple lobby, I was reminded of the generic medical office building that many of us inhabit. Perhaps the most striking aspect of the Dirksen’s design is its long hallway corridors that are bare except for the occasional cluster of flags that mark the entrance to a senator’s office suite. Once inside, the visitor is told to sit in a waiting room whose walls are adorned by an array of sports-related memorabilia. There are photos and newspaper clippings depicting winning goals and Super Bowl touchdowns or other iconic items, such as autographed team jerseys. On mahogany desktops, I noticed many signed baseballs, basketballs, and hockey pucks. It must be fun representing a region like Boston with so many championship teams! Invariably, there is the requisite photograph of the politician shaking hands and/or sharing a joke with a recent president; in general, that president is Ronald Reagan if the politician is a Republican and Bill Clinton if said politician is a Democrat.

At each office, we were greeted by the perpetually smiling, well-caffeinated, friendly young staffers. These legislative aides (LAs) are a very devoted bunch. They reminded me of their medical peers, the hardworking residents and fellows that we have the privilege of working with every day. They are cut from the same cloth, except they probably chose not to major in pre-med studies in college. Both groups are of similar age, smart, upbeat, hardworking people who are poorly paid for their efforts. Since they work in Congress, I doubt that work-hour rules apply to them. No matter, they seem to thrive on the arcane minutia of the legislative process.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Fixing the SGR

During our limited time with the staffers, we raised the thorny issue of how to fix the Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) in a way that recognizes the value of our professional services to our patients. The SGR is essentially an equation that was created in 1997 as a way for Medicare to control rising physician fees. It tries to ensure that the yearly increase in the federal expense per Medicare beneficiary does not exceed the growth in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). However, the methodology behind SGR is considered by many observers to be highly suspect.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legislation & AdvocacyOpinionProfessional TopicsRheuminationsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:AC&RAdvocacyAmerican College of Rheumatology (ACR)CongressHelfgottLegislationMedicarePoliticsrheumatologistRheumPACSGR

Related Articles

    President’s Perspective: ACR Addresses Reform of Sustainable Growth Rate Formula

    December 1, 2013

    The College’s multi-pronged plan to replace flawed SGR payment system requires continued support from rheumatologists, healthcare professionals

    Letter: Consider the Bent Fork

    February 1, 2013

    As rheumatologists, when people ask us about wearing the bent fork lapel pin, we have the opportunity to educate the public about the Simple Tasks Campaign and the value of rheumatology

    Why We Are Advocates

    September 5, 2012

    Rheumatology advocacy efforts are paying off in 2012.

    Rheumatologists React to Looming Medicare Payment Reductions

    November 1, 2011

    MedPAC recommends deep cuts to physician payments

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences