Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

ACR Advocates Against Payer Mandates on Specialty Pharmacy Acquisition of In-Office Treatments

From the College  |  March 23, 2020

As a growing number of health plans enact policies that require specialty pharmacy acquisition of in-office treatments, the ACR is greatly concerned about the impact of these changes on rheumatology practices and patients. This concern has increased in the face of the COVID-19 public health crisis, as we urge health plans to avoid any policy change that would increase administrate burden or disrupt patient care.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee (BCBST) announced in fall 2019 that all specialty drugs would have to be acquired through the BCBST specialty pharmacy network as of Jan. 1, 2020. After hearing significant opposition from stakeholders, it pushed back the implementation date to July 1, 2020. If BCBST moves forward with this policy, the ACR is concerned that other payers could follow their lead.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The ACR has led two sign-on letters to BCBST since the payer’s initial announcement. The first letter was co-signed by 10 other state and national rheumatology organizations. After the policy was delayed, the ACR sent a second letter with support from several other specialties, including dermatology, gastroenterology, neurology and urology. The ACR also issued a press release highlighting the coalition letter and detailing our concerns about the proposed policy’s impact on patient access to treatment.

Members in other states have reported similar specialty pharmacy mandates in various employer-sponsored plans. In these cases, the restrictions are included in the plans’ benefit design and may be presented to employers as an opportunity to reduce costs without additional information on how patients and providers will be impacted or how the payer or pharmacy benefit manager may benefit. ACR has partnered with the Arthritis Foundation on a one-pager to help educate patients and employers about the harmful consequences of these specialty pharmacy mandates.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The ACR will continue to advocate against any policy mandating specialty pharmacy acquisition of in-office treatments. During the unprecedented COVID-19 public health emergency, the ACR is also advocating that BCBST and other payers delay implementation of any policies that would increase administrate burden or disrupt patient care so that members can remain focused on patient care at this critical time.

For questions or more information, contact [email protected].

Share: 

Filed under:InsuranceLegislation & Advocacy Tagged with:COVID-19In-office treatmentinsurancepharmacy benefit managersspecialty drug acquisition

Related Articles

    ACR Continues to Advocate Against Payer Mandates on Specialty Pharmacy Acquisition of In-Office Treatments

    June 5, 2020

    Despite efforts by the ACR and other organizations, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee has indicated that it will move forward with implementation of its specialty pharmacy acquisition mandate on July 1, 2020.

    The Many Facets of COVID-19: Experts Address Basic & Clinical Research Concepts in the COVID-19 Era

    November 23, 2021

    New concepts in autoimmunity & immunology are being discovered daily in research being conducted to understand the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its implications for rheumatology & all fields of medicine. Here are some insights shared by experts during day 1 of the Basic and Clinical Research Conference.

    Vax Hesitancy? Myths & Facts for Patients

    December 16, 2021

    Although more than 189,300,000 eligible Americans are fully vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 as of Oct. 18, 2021, vaccine hesitancy persists.1 The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), citing data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey collected between May 26 and June 7, 2021, reports that in some U.S. counties—particularly in the Southeast…

    Coverage & Reimbursement Challenges: Updates from the ACR Insurance Subcommittee Chair

    February 7, 2020

    The ACR Insurance Subcommittee is working to address specialty pharmacy requirements for in-office treatments, elimination of consultation codes and other coverage and reimbursement challenges.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences