Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

ACR Advocates Against VIVIO Interference in Patient Care Decisions

From the College  |  May 7, 2021

VIVIO, a specialty pharmacy benefit manager, is contracting with self-funded employer health plans to reduce spending on specialty drugs. The ACR has received numerous complaints about VIVIO policies that threaten patient access and disrupt practice workflow, including non-medical switching, tapering patients off biologics, specialty pharmacy acquisition mandates and site-of-service restrictions.

The ACR sent a letter to VIVIO expressing opposition to these policies and highlighting the negative impact they have on patients and practices. Despite a follow-up discussion with VIVIO leadership, the ACR remains deeply concerned that its policies undermine providers’ clinical decision making and place patients’ health and safety at risk. The ACR is working to raise awareness about this issue and will continue advocating against policies that prioritize cost over patients’ health and quality of life.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

For questions regarding this issue or other insurance concerns, contact [email protected].

Share: 

Filed under:From the CollegeLegislation & Advocacy Tagged with:Advocacypharmacy benefit managersspecialty drug acquisition

Related Articles

    The Cost of Free Pharmaceutical Services

    October 18, 2019

    Marko Aliaksandr / shutterstock.com The cards sat, untouched, in a corner of my desk. In the 1800s, it was common for American saloons to provide patrons with a free meal. Of course, the meal came with a catch: The meals were predictably salt laden and designed to encourage patrons to drink more beer. Hence was…

    Tail Insurance Protects Against Medical Malpractice Claims from Previous Jobs

    February 1, 2013

    Physicians who are resigning, retiring, switching jobs, or are terminated should consider tail insurance to cover malpractice claims brought after they’ve left their current employer

    How to Navigate the Employment Offer

    September 6, 2022

    There’s nothing quite as exciting as answering a phone call to hear the words: “You’re hired.” After hours of research and preparation, multiple interviews and a healthy dose of daydreaming about your first day, you’ve made it across the finish line. Except for one final hurdle—the negotiation process. Don’t overlook it. The negotiation process is…

    What Rheumatologists Should Know About Noncompetition Clauses

    October 1, 2012

    How rheumatologists can manage, and avoid, a restrictive noncompetition clause in an employment contract

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences