Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

ACR Releases New Position Statements on Site of Service & Compounding

Mary Beth Nierengarten  |  March 1, 2017

Patient Safety & Site of Service for Biologics
Although emphasizing its strong support for the use of biologic agents as necessary treatments for rheumatic diseases, the ACR Board of Directors continues to be concerned about the safe delivery of these agents, given the potential for associated adverse events and infusion reactions. In a position statement on patient safety and site of service for biologics, the Board says that it supports the standard of care for the delivery of these agents by a trained provider.1

“We favor supervision of biologic infusions by providers trained in the administration of these complex agents in a setting that maximizes patient safety, such as a physician’s office, hospital outpatient infusion center or free-standing infusion center with proper supervision,” says Sean Fahey, MD, chair of the Insurance Subcommittee and a member of the Committee on Rheumatologic Care (CORC).

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Because of the potential for serious drug reactions and the need for clinical monitoring and mitigation of this risk by trained professionals, Dr. Fahey emphasizes that the Board opposes policies that mandate home infusions, which undermine patient safety, solely to cut costs.

The Issue of Compounding
Addressing a separate issue concerning compounding of pharmacologic agents, Donald Miller, PharmD, professor of pharmacy practice, College of Health Professionals, North Dakota State University, says that the ACR has looked carefully at the issue of pharmaceutical compounding and is lobbying the appropriate agencies for positions favorable to rheumatology.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

As the lead author of the ACR’s position statement on compounding of pharmacologic agents, Dr. Miller highlighted two main issues addressed in the statement:2 1) allowing physicians to do limited sterile compounding (i.e., admixing two different sterile drugs in one syringe) in the office without additional precautions; and 2) allowing continued pharmacy compounding of quinacrine for patients who do not respond well to hydroxychloroquine.

The position statement highlights the importance of allowing rheumatologists to follow the standard of care in compounding and administering medications in the office setting, such as for performing joint and soft tissue injections, using a combined local anesthetic and corticosteroid. “This procedure must be protected,” the ACR says in its position statement.2

In addition, the statement emphasizes the need for continued permission to compound quinacrine via addition to the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) bulk substances list. The ACR emphasizes that only drugs compliant with the use of bulk substances should be permitted for compounding. “For the time being, the FDA is not taking action on this issue until it makes a final decision on which drugs have sufficient evidence of efficacy to add to the list,” the ACR notes in its statement.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsLegislation & Advocacy Tagged with:biologic infusionsdrug compoundingposition statementquinacrine

Related Articles

    New Compounding Regulations could Adversely Affect Rheumatologists, Patients

    May 4, 2018

    On July 28, 2018, the USP will publish preliminary updates to existing drug compounding standards that could affect whether rheumatologists maintain the ability to mix, combine or otherwise customize medications in office for individual patient use. The ACR, in concert with the American Medical Association (AMA) and others, is working to help ensure rheumatologists can…

    The ACR Takes a Stand: How Position Statements Are Created

    March 6, 2023

    Through the development of position statements that lay out the ACR’s official stance on issues related to the management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions, the Committee on Rheumatologic Care helps outline policies that affect the practice of rheumatology and the wellbeing and care of patients.

    Congress Considers More Regulation for Manufacturers of Compounding Drugs

    July 22, 2013

    New legislation would place manufacturers of compounding drugs under FDA supervision. (posted July 22, 2013)

    The ACR Releases New Telemedicine Position Statement

    July 6, 2020

    The rapid expansion of telemedicine in rheumatology, as well as changes to reimbursement and relaxed regulations, during the COVID-19 pandemic has served as an impetus for the ACR to review its position and release a new statement in support of optimized telemedicine practices.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences