Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

ACR Works to Eliminate Part B Drug Costs from MIPS Payment Adjustments

Kelly Tyrrell  |  October 19, 2017

The group also wrote that the move would “significantly and adversely exaggerate the magnitude of the bonuses and penalties provided under MIPS for medical specialties that routinely administer prescription drugs by infusion or injection,” and break from the intention of MACRA to give physicians greater control of quality care delivery. The ACR was active in educating lawmakers about the letter and asking that they sign on.

Indeed, the CMS rule could lead to perverse incentives, says Dr. Amodeo. “If physicians know they will be penalized, this could result in access problems for patients needing expensive drugs, whereas for physicians getting the bonus, there would be the potential for substantial bonuses if they prescribe or treat patients with expensive Part B drugs.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

All Hands on Deck
The CMS is expected to release its final rule on Nov. 1, Dr. Worthing says, adding that if Part B costs remain a factor considered in payment adjustments, “then it will be critical for rheumatologists and rheumatology health professionals to tell their members of Congress to fix this problem.”

Already, the ACR has taken several significant steps to clarify or reverse the proposed rule, including submitting comments to the CMS and to the House Ways and Means Committee, signing on to a letter with the AMA and with the American Academy of Ophthalmology,5 and meeting with staff from the Ways and Means Committee and Senate Finance Committee.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“We’ve got all hands on deck, as they say,” says Dr. Worthing. “The ACR is doing everything it can to get this done. We’ve written letters, met with Congress, formed coalitions with other specialties, and we’ve generated coverage from important inside-the-beltway press that key leaders read. We also hope the AMA will help take up our cause in its November interim meeting.”

What You Can Do
Individual rheumatologists and rheumatology providers and practices should also communicate with their elected officials, Dr. Amodeo said, noting that the rule may require a statutory fix and without hearing from constituents “Congress seems very unwilling to open MACRA back up.”

Unsure how to achieve this?

“This can be as easy as sending an email through the ACR’s Legislative Action Center, sending a tweet tagging one’s representative or even setting up a meeting in the member’s district office,” says Dr. Worthing. “The ACR Executive Committee has already met with key Congressional committees that realize the importance of this problem, but input from their constituents will be critical to help break the gridlock in Washington, D.C.”

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingLegislation & AdvocacyPractice Support Tagged with:CMS proposed ruleMACRAMIPSPart B drug costs

Related Articles

    2024 Proposed Rule for the Quality Payment Program Released

    August 17, 2023

    See key changes for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System for the 2024 performance year as outlined in the proposed rule.

    2022 PFS Final Rule for the Quality Payment Program Published

    December 2, 2021

    The ACR highlights essential information for providers for 2022 MIPS reporting in the 2022 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule, published Nov. 2.

    Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015: What You Should Know

    April 15, 2016

    There is no denying that the past few years have been a time of immense change in healthcare. Sweeping pieces of legislation have fundamentally altered the way we practice medicine. This is absolutely the case when it comes to the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA, for short). MACRA is an enormous…

    Prepare Now to Survive MACRA

    July 5, 2016

    The year 2015 brought an end to the much-maligned Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR), sometimes known as the “doc fix.” The SGR established limits on Medicare reimbursement for physicians, and each year, physicians and those lobbying on their behalf were forced to stave off drastic cuts to their payments. “The SGR was Congress’s attempt to control…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences