Video: Knock on Wood| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-youtube-playfa-rss

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Lupus Nephritis
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

The ACR’s Advocacy at State Legislature Level in 2016 Focuses on Biosimilars, Step Therapy

From the College  |  Issue: August 2016  |  August 10, 2016

Tashatuvango/shutterstock.com

Tashatuvango/shutterstock.com

A majority of state legislatures have concluded their work for 2016. The ACR’s state advocacy efforts continued to focus on policy benefiting rheumatologists and patients alike. The two dominant issues this year were biosimilar substitution and step therapy.

Biosimilar Substitution

Biosimilar substitution remains the most prevalent issue throughout the states. The ACR continues to monitor all of these bills and to comment and take action on behalf of the rheumatology community.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The major biosimilars policy issue at the state level is centered on prescriber substitution. Meaning, if a lower-cost biosimilar that the FDA has deemed “interchangeable” is available, the pharmacist can dispense the lower-cost option. The ACR’s position on substitution is that the prescriber must be notified if a substitution takes place prior to or within 24 hours. Since 2012, some states have not required the prescriber to be notified of this type of substitution, creating potential patient safety issues. The ACR succeeded in working with partners, such as the Arthritis Foundation and others, and coalitions so that state substitution laws resemble the ACR’s policy.

In 2016, all biosimilar substitution legislation that was signed into law had prescriber notification of no longer than five business days.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Arizona, Idaho, Kentucky, Missouri, Oregon and Rhode Island all passed biosimilar bills this year. The following states and territories passed legislation regarding biosimilar substitution in previous years:

  • California
  • Colorado
  • Delaware
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Louisiana
  • Massachusetts
  • New Jersey
  • North Carolina
  • North Dakota
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Utah
  • Virginia
  • Washington
  • Puerto Rico

The FDA has not approved any interchangeable biosimilars for use.

Step Edits/Step Therapy Reform

Continued success for insurance reform has been seen throughout 2016. Legislatures were receptive to patient/consumer issues that arise from step therapy. The ACR does not support step therapy and believes that rheumatologists should direct their patients’ care, not insurance formularies. The reform measures that the ACR supported across the country would allow a physician to override an insurer’s step therapy protocol or reduce the time the patient has to participate in that step.

The ACR was effective in partnering with patient groups and others in support of these reforms and supported lobby days in state capitols across the country.

Illinois, Indiana, New York and West Virginia passed step therapy reform this year, with multiple bills still showing promise in other states.

Looking Forward

Insurance reform is still a major focus for patient and provider groups across the country. Payers of all kinds continue to put more pressure on providers by increasing the cost share for patients and through burdensome administrative requirements. This forces the providers’ offices to focus on navigating paperwork, allowing less time for increased access for patients.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:From the CollegeLegislation & Advocacy Tagged with:ACR/ARHPAdvocacyAmerican College of Rheumatology (ACR)BiosimilarsdruglawmakerLegislationrheumatologiststatetherapyTreatment

Related Articles

    ACR Advocacy at the State Level in 2016

    July 18, 2016

    A majority of state legislatures have concluded their work for 2016. The ACR’s state advocacy efforts continued to focus on policy benefiting rheumatologists and patients alike. The two dominant issues this year were biosimilar substitution and step therapy. Biosimilar Substitution Biosimilar substitution remains the most prevalent issue throughout the states. The ACR continues to monitor…

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    April 15, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

    The Biosimilars Debate Heats Up: Potential cost savings weighed against patient health & safety

    March 1, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

    Possible Impact of Biosimilar Infliximab on U.S. Market in Prescriptions, Pricing

    September 8, 2016

    The use of biosimilars for rheuma­tology in the U.S. became a reality when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb), a biosimilar to Remicade (infliximab), in April. What this may mean is increased competition among drug companies with regard to pricing and, therefore, potentially lower costs for U.S. patients, according to Seoyoung…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-youtube-playfa-rss
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences