Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Age-Related Blood Pressue Patterns in Lupus

Renée Bacher  |  Issue: June 2020  |  June 15, 2020

Patients on hydroxychloroquine had significantly lower blood pressure variability.

The investigators measured disease activity with the SELENA revision of the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythema­tosus National Assessment–Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index instrument score and the Physician Global Assessment. At each visit, they measured blood pressure using a Carescape Dinamap V100 monitor calibrated once every 12 months according to manufacturer guidelines with patients seated and the arm supported at heart level.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The cohort was divided into subsets of patients, with each subset approximately 92% female. Most (60%) were younger than age 40 at entry to the cohort, although a small proportion (6%) was 60 or older. Most were Caucasian (55%) or African American (38%).

Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure measures were estimated using random intercept models, fit by restricted maximum likelihood. Using this approach, the investigators got estimates of the mean blood pressure, the within-person standard deviation (i.e., the standard deviation of an individual’s blood pressure around their personal mean) and the between-person standard deviation (i.e., the standard deviation of the person-specific mean blood pressures). They compared means with national data collected from 2001–2008 by analyzing data from 22,672 clinic visits of 1,509 cohort members between 2001 and 2008.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The researchers used data from the National Health Statistics Reports (19,921 adults aged 18 and over with blood pressure estimates calculated using the mean of up to three measurements) to compare the estimated means to the mean systolic and diastolic pressures in the general population.7 They used a larger sample, including data from 52,791 cohort visits of 2,128 patients seen from 1987 to 2013, to obtain more precise estimates of the means and variances of blood pressure by age.

To analyze the relationship between clinical and demographic characteristics and blood pressure variability, the researchers used random intercept models to estimate within-patient and between-patient BPV. They used likelihood ratio tests to determine the statistical significance of differences between clinical subgroups with respect to BPV. The analysis was based on 63,890 clinic visits of 2,525 cohort members from 1987 to 2018.

The researchers analyzed the relationship between blood pressure parameters and cardiovascular events based on 1,340 cohort members who had at least eight clinical assessments of blood pressure in the cohort between 1987 and 2013. Ninety-two percent of the cohort members were women, and the average duration of follow-up was 6.2 years. The researchers defined cardiovascular events as stroke, myocardial infarction, incident angina, a coronary procedure (coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention) or claudication. Considering only the first cardiovascular event for each person, 105 events occurred.

The researchers aggregated person-months and calculated the risks of a cardiovascular event by monthly characteristics. They excluded person-months after a previous cardiovascular event. For each month of follow-up for a patient, the previous eight blood pressure measurements were included in the analysis. The following variables were calculated based on those most recent past eight measures, and the information was later linked to whether the patient experienced a cardiovascular event that month:

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsResearch RheumSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Tagged with:atherosclerosisblood pressure variability (BPV)cardiovascular event

Related Articles
    Lupus often presents with a butterfly rash.

    Top 12: Research in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus at a Glance

    November 18, 2021

    Dr. Pisetsky’s picks for the top research in lupus presented at ACR Convergence 2021.

    A Heart In Danger

    November 1, 2006

    Rheumatologists should monitor and aggressively treat cardiac risk factors in patients with lupus and rheumatoid arthritis

    A Better Family Plan

    October 1, 2007

    How to minimize the risks of pregnancy for women with SLE

    T Cells in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    August 1, 2011

    Progress toward targeted therapy

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences