Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Anti-TNF Treatment Trial Encouraging for High-Risk APS Pregnancies

Thomas R. Collins  |  November 19, 2020

ACR CONVERGENCE 2020—Adding a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker to another treatment could greatly lower the risk of serious complications during pregnancy for women who have antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) with lupus anticoagulant, according to early results of a phase 2 trial presented at ACR Convergence 2020.

The findings could mean life-changing opportunities for women at high risk for pregnancy complications, according to Jane Salmon, MD, Collette Kean Research Chair at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, and professor of medicine and professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, speaking in the Rheumatology Research Foundation Memorial Lectureship to Honor Shaun Ruddy, MD. Dr. Salmon is co-lead of the IMPACT trial, which is testing the use of certolizumab in a group of women at very high risk of major pregnancy complications.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“This is remarkable work and will potentially change the care of women during their pregnancy,” said session moderator Michael Weinblatt, MD, John R. and Eileen K. Riedman Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, Boston, and R. Bruce and Joan M. Mickey Distinguished Chair in Rheumatology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston.

Dr. Salmon

Fetal Mortality & Preeclampsia Rates Remain High
The findings come at a time when pregnancy is considered safer for women with lupus, but the risk of preeclampsia and poor fetal outcomes remains high in certain patients, Dr. Salmon said.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“In-hospital maternal mortality in women with lupus has dramatically decreased,” she said, pointing to a nationwide study with data from 1998–2015.1 But the same study showed fetal mortality in the pregnancies of women with lupus over that time did not improve nearly as much, remaining two to three times higher than in women without lupus, and rates of preeclampsia have actually been rising among women with lupus.

Dr. Salmon traced the line of research that led to this latest therapeutic breakthrough.

Prior research found inhibiting inflammation that caused placental injury—specifically, blocking C5a and C5a-receptor interactions—rescued pregnancy in mice injected with antiphospholipid antibodies. The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies has proved the strongest predictor of pregnancy complications in women with lupus.

Given the importance of activated inflammatory cells, investigators focused on TNFα, which is released by these cells and has been successfully targeted to prevent injury of other tissues. In pregnant mice that received antiphospholipid antibodies, as well as an antibody-independent mouse model with a preeclampsia-like syndrome, TNFα blockade was able to rescue pregnancy and normalize the development of the placenta, researchers found.2

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ACR ConvergenceConditionsMeeting ReportsOther Rheumatic Conditions Tagged with:ACR Convergence 2020ACR Convergence 2020 - SLEAntiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome (APS)Hughes SyndromeLupus

Related Articles

    A Better Family Plan

    October 1, 2007

    How to minimize the risks of pregnancy for women with SLE

    APS: What Rheumatologists Should Know about Hughes Syndrome

    February 17, 2016

    The problem that dogs the work of all of those treating patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the apparent lack of knowledge of the syndrome, both by the general public, as well as by swaths of the medical fraternity. Perhaps it was ever thus—a syndrome less than 40 years old could be described as new,…

    Antiphospholipid Antibody Testing Update

    January 13, 2012

    Successes, challenges, and controversies of diagnostic methods for APS

    Rheumatologists Should Discuss with Patients Use of Immunomodulatory Agents During Pregnancy

    November 16, 2016

    The decision to continue or discontinue immunomodulatory medications during pregnancy is a difficult one for both patients and physicians. On the one hand, when left untreated, rheumatic conditions can cause harm to an unborn child, as well as to the pregnant mother. On the other hand, medications can be harmful to a developing fetus. In…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences