Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Antibodies Can Spot RA in the General Population

Reuters Staff  |  May 9, 2016

NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), particularly high anti-CCP2 titers, can diagnose rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the general population with a high degree of accuracy, a Swedish study suggests.

ACPA are highly specific for RA, but until now the diagnostic accuracy of ACPA in the general population has not been “thoroughly assessed,” note Dr. Aase Haj Hensvold of the Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, and colleagues in their April 28 Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases online report.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

They assessed the diagnostic accuracy of ACPA for RA in 12,590 population-representative Swedish twins. They analyzed serum samples for the presence of ACPA using anti-CCP2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and all ACPA-positive samples were further tested on ELISAs for four peptide-specific ACPA. They identified patients with RA in the Swedish National Patient Register at inclusion and after a median of 37 months.

They report that 350 of all 12,590 individuals (2.8%) had a positive anti-CCP2 test, measuring ACPA, and 103 of these individuals (29.4%) had an RA diagnosis at the time of blood donation and inclusion. During follow-up, an additional 21 of the remaining 247 ACPA-positive individuals (8.5%) developed RA.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“Overall, a positive anti-CCP2 test had a positive predictive value of 29% for prevalent RA at inclusion (negative predictive value of 99.6%),” the investigators report. High titers of anti-CCP2 (>3 times cut-off) increased the positive predictive value to 48% (negative predictive value of 99.5%), they note.

“ACPA-positive individuals without RA had lower anti-CCP2 titers and fewer peptide-specific ACPA than ACPA-positive patients with RA and higher C reactive protein levels than ACPA-negative individuals without RA,” they further report.

The investigators also note that, with more than 12,000 individuals in the study, it’s so far the largest to report on the diagnostic accuracy of ACPA and the results align with these previous reports showing a high specificity of anti-CCP2 for RA.

They say the “lack of consecutive ACPA testing in same subjects is a limitation preventing estimation of the predictive values of variable ACPA status over time but will be an important task for future studies.”

“In conclusion, we have demonstrated that ACPA testing in a population-based setting has high specificity for prevalent RA. High anti-CCP titer entails better prediction for RA and is linked to multiple ACPA reactivities and higher CRP levels,” they write.

The study had no commercial funding. One author holds a patent protecting the use of CitC1 peptide. Dr. Hensvold did not respond to a request for comment by press time.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:ACPAanti-citrullinated protein antibodiesRheumatiod arthritisscreeningTesting

Related Articles

    Researchers Propose a Sensitive, Specific Biomarker for Rheumatoid Arthritis

    January 19, 2021

    A proposed biomarker may improve the diagnosis of rheuma­toid arthritis (RA). Writing in Arthritis & Rheumatology, researchers at Pleasanton, Calif.-based Roche Sequencing Solutions and the University of Toronto say their biomarker, constructed by profiling a comprehensive set of antibodies via high-density peptide array, has high specificity and sensitivity for RA, compared with commercially available assays.1…

    Researchers Seek to Predict & Prevent Rheumatoid Arthritis

    June 21, 2018

    Preventing adverse outcomes in individuals who have rheumatic diseases is a daily goal for rheumatologists. For example, rheumatologists prescribe medications and perform screening to prevent erosions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), renal failure in systemic lupus erythematosus and flares across all diseases. Many of these actions are classified as secondary or tertiary prevention, because individuals have…

    Laboratory Testing for Diagnosis, Management of Patients with Rheumatic Disease

    December 1, 2014

    A review of data on antinuclear antibodies and tests for rheumatoid arthritis

    Know Your Labs, Part 2

    April 1, 2009

    A review of testing for rheumatoid arthritis

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences