Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

A&R and AC&R Abstracts: Pain in RA

Staff  |  Issue: October 2011  |  October 7, 2011

Conclusion: At equal levels of pressure, patients with CLBP or fibromyalgia experienced significantly more pain and showed more extensive, common patterns of neuronal activation in pain-related cortical areas. When stimuli that elicited equally painful responses were applied (requiring significantly lower pressure in both patient groups as compared with the control group), neuronal activations were similar among the three groups. These findings are consistent with the occurrence of augmented central pain processing in patients with idiopathic CLBP.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most common and expensive musculoskeletal disorders in developed countries. Back pain in general affects 70–85% of all people at some time in their lives, but 90% of affected individuals recover, typically within 12 weeks. Recovery after 12 weeks is slow and uncertain, and this subset of patients with CLBP accounts for major expenses in the health care and disability systems.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Despite the magnitude of the problem, little is known about the precise cause of CLBP. There is often a mismatch between objective findings and symptoms. Despite advances in imaging, in most patients, it is impossible to determine whether identifiable structural or mechanical abnormalities are responsible for the symptoms. Moreover, even when anatomic abnormalities are detected, the significance is unclear, since bulging disks or annular tears are found in high percentages of asymptomatic individuals. This mismatch between anatomic abnormalities and symptoms has led to studies of the psychosocial factors that may contribute to CLBP. These studies suggest that increasing age, female sex, lower levels of formal education, depression, stress, job dissatisfaction, and disability/compensation issues may play some role in expression of symptoms and in chronicity. However, all of the known anatomic, demographic, and psychosocial factors that might cause CLBP do not explain the symptoms in a significant number of subjects. These individuals are sometimes referred to as having “idiopathic” or “nonspecific” CLBP.

Pain in other idiopathic chronic pain conditions, such as irritable bowel syndrome and fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), appears to result from abnormalities in pain processing rather than from damage or inflammation of peripheral structures. A common finding in these and other “central” or “non-nociceptive” pain syndromes is increased tenderness to pressure, which can be classified as mechanical hyperalgesia (i.e., increased pain in response to normally painful stimuli) and/or mechanical allodynia (i.e., pain in response to normally nonpainful stimuli). These abnormalities are found even in the absence of any identifiable psychological or behavioral factors, thus implicating central mechanisms that exacerbate pain (e.g., “wind-up”) or that attenuate pathways that begin in the brain stem and normally inhibit the ascending transmission of pain-related activity.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsPain SyndromesResearch RheumSoft Tissue Pain Tagged with:FibromyalgiaPainResearchRheumatic Disease

Related Articles

    Revising Fibromyalgia: One Year Later

    July 12, 2011

    The 2010 ACR fibromyalgia criteria capture the broader clinical picture and help ensure more appropriate diagnosis and management by primary care

    Neurological Piece of the Fibromyalgia Puzzle

    November 1, 2009

    Exploring the peripheral and central elements of pain in FM

    fMRI Provides Visual Evidence of Pain

    January 1, 2015

    Functional MRI scans that show how pain changes the brain could help rheumatologists develop better approaches to pain relief

    Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis

    October 7, 2011

    Out from the shadow of inflammation

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences