Video: Knock on Wood| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-youtube-playfa-rss

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Lupus Nephritis
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Avoid the Trap of Balance Billing

From the College  |  Issue: June 2016  |  June 13, 2016

pogonici/shutterstock.com

pogonici/shutterstock.com

It is no secret that payers and providers have conflict as it relates to reimbursement rates for medical services, and there is another stakeholder, the patient, that plays an important role in the financial impact of healthcare reimbursement. Usually, patients are faced with unforeseen bills from their providers due to an unpaid portion of a claim. This is usually referred to as balance billing. Balance billing, also called “extra billing,” is defined as a healthcare provider billing a patient for the difference between what the patient’s health insurance chooses to reimburse and what the provider chooses to charge. For example, if the provider charges $100 for a service and the allowed amount is $70, the practice bills the patient the remaining $30. The question is: Does the patient actually owe the balance of a bill after their insurance pays?

To Bill or Not to Bill Is the Question

At a glance this may not seem like a problem, but if a provider is a preferred provider or contracted with a health plan, he or she may not balance bill for covered charges. The key is knowing when you can or cannot balance bill a patient. Billing a patient for any charges or balance of a bill above the allowable rate in the provider contract is considered illegal. Most healthcare plans will inform the provider as to what is permissible to collect or what the patient is responsible for under their coverage benefits. Practices can collect up front at the time of service for any co-pays, co-insurance, deductible or any amount due for services not covered by the patient’s plan.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

On the other hand, out-of-network physicians, those not bounded by contractual in-network rate agreements, have the ability to bill patients for the entire remaining balance. Keep in mind, if the insurance plan or the contract specifies that the patient is not responsible for any deductible, co-pay or co-insurance, then it is also illegal to bill the patient for any charges.

The rise in unpaid medical bills has a detrimental financial impact on physician practices and the healthcare system at large. The increase on administrative burdens and accounts receivable has unanticipated consequences to cost and budget in practices. The biggest problem practices are facing with balance billing is due to a lack of transparency from the insurance plans with their beneficiaries. There are some cases where patients are unaware they received care or services outside of their network until they receive the bill for the balance. Additionally, insurance plans deny or reject charges that should be paid, but inform patients that there is no balance on their bill—again, this leaves practices stuck with an unpaid bill or having to write off a lot of charges.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The federal government is concerned about erroneous balance billing practices as they relate to qualified Medicare beneficiaries. As a result, in February 2016, Medicare revised its MedLearn Matters article, SE1128, Prohibition on Balance Billing Dually Eligible Individuals Enrolled in the Qualified Medicare Beneficiary (QMB) Program, indicating: “Federal law bars Medicare providers from balance billing a QMB beneficiary under any circumstances.” See Section 1902(n)(3)(B) of the Social Security Act, as modified by Section 4714 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997.

QMB is a Medicaid program for Medicare beneficiaries that exempts them from liability for Medicare cost sharing. State Medicaid programs may pay providers for Medicare deductibles, co-insurance and co-payments. However, as permitted by federal law, states can limit provider reimbursement for Medicare cost sharing under certain circumstances. Medicare providers must accept the Medicare payment and Medicaid payment (if any) as payment in full for services rendered to a QMB beneficiary. Medicare providers who violate these billing prohibitions are violating their Medicare Provider Agreement and may be subject to sanctions. (See Sections 1902(n)(3)(C); 1905(p)(3); 1866(a)(1)(A); 1848(g)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act.)

Providers who participate in traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage Plans (not only those that accept Medicaid) must follow all of their balance billing exclusions. It is vital that front- and back-office staff members understand the process of balance billing and exclusions for Medicare and private carriers. It is also significant to know the billing process if a patient has dual coverage, whether it is with commercial insurance and/or Medicare. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 prohibits the collection of cost-share amounts directly from dual-eligible individuals (i.e., individuals who have both Medicare and Medicaid). Providers who serve patients who are dually eligible must either accept the payment received as payment in full or seek reimbursement for any cost share from the appropriate state source. For additional information on dual eligibility, visit the CMS website.

To avoid any and all confusion with patient responsibility and uncovered services, it is important for practices to diligently strive to inform patients of their covered services versus what the insurance will pay or will not pay for. The financial impact of writing off charges due to denied claims or patients disputing a bill is inconvenient and inefficient. Physicians and practice managers should review and update all documents and software that are used to capture charges to avoid any outstanding charges in accounts or write-offs. Taking the necessary proactive steps to protect your practice’s financial status is necessary.

For more information on billing, coding and practice management or to set up training for your practice, visit Rheumatology or contact the ACR’s Practice Management Director Antanya Chung at [email protected].

Get Familiar with Balance Billing Terminology

  • Contracted Plan: An agreement between an insurer and a physician stating that the provider will accept a specific or contracted dollar amount for each service, regardless of what the provider actually charges for the service.
  • Allowable: The contracted amount a physician agrees to accept as a complete reimbursement for a service. The allowable consists of the portion the insurance will pay and the portion the patient must pay.
  • Write-off: The difference between the physician’s charge and the allowable, which may not be collected from either the patient or rebilled to the insurance plan.
  • Accepting assignment: A physician who accepts assignment agrees to the insurance plan’s allowable and write-off amounts.
  • In network: Providers or healthcare facilities that are part of a health plan’s network of providers with which it has negotiated a discount.
  • Out of network: Refers to physicians, hospitals or other healthcare providers who are considered nonparticipants in an insurance plan (usually an HMO or PPO).

Page: 1 2 3 | Multi-Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingFrom the CollegePractice Support Tagged with:AC&RAmerican College of Rheumatology (ACR)CodingHealth InsuranceMedicaidMedicarePractice Managementrheumatologist

Related Articles

    Practice Page: Is In-house or Outsourced Medical Billing Right for Your Physician Practice?

    February 1, 2014

    What to consider when deciding whether to delegate claims billing in-house or to contract with an outside company

    Medicare Incident-to Billing Rules, Pitfalls

    May 15, 2015

    Image Credit: iQoncept/shutterstock.com In today’s busy rheumatology practices, the services of nurse practitioners, physician assistants, occupational therapists and clinical nurse specialists are a great asset for patient flow, as well as increased revenue. As the growth of nonphysician providers (NPPs) in rheumatology practices has evolved, it has become increasingly important to understand the incident-to rules…

    How to Bill Medicare Patients for Non-Covered Services

    April 19, 2017

    How do you collect payment for services the insurance company won’t pay for? Indypendenz/shutterstock.com What do you do when you are presented with a patient who needs treatment but the patient’s insurance company will not pay for the services? Can you provide the services anyway? Who will pay for them? How do you collect payment…

    New No-Surprises Rules May Affect Rheumatology Services at Hospitals

    April 15, 2022

    This month, we offer an overview of the federal No Surprises Act, which stipulates that healthcare insurers may not surprise patients with out-of-network care bills, instead requiring healthcare providers and insurers to broker price compromises between themselves. The No Surprises Act, enacted on a bipartisan basis in December 2020, protects patients from surprise billing from…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-youtube-playfa-rss
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences