Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Baricitinib Also Appears Effective in Biologic-Refractory RA

Reuters Staff  |  February 21, 2018

NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—The selective Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor baricitinib appears also to help patients whose rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has not responded adequately to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, according to results from the RA-BEACON randomized trial.

The previously published overall results from RA-BEACON showed that baricitinib-treated patients had significantly better functional and clinical responses at week 12 than placebo.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In the current study, Dr. Mark C. Genovese from Stanford University Medical Center, in Palo Alto, California, and colleagues undertook exploratory, post hoc analyses to evaluate the effect of prior use of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) on the efficacy and safety of baricitinib.

For the primary endpoint, a 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 12, there were no significant interactions based on the patient’s prior experience by the number of prior dMARDS, the number of prior TNF inhibitors, the number of prior non-TNF inhibitor treatments, or specific prior TNF inhibitor, the team reports in Rheumatology, online February 3.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Similarly, when evaluating ACR20 responses at weeks 12 and 24 according to the patient’s last bDMARD before randomization, the researchers found that response rates for baricitinib were numerically higher than those for placebo regardless of which TNF inhibitor or non-TNF inhibitor was used, with the exception of baricitinib 2 mg versus infliximab.

There was no increase in serious infections for either baricitinib dose according to prior biologic use, including for patients who had received multiple prior biologics.

“Baricitinib demonstrated a consistent, beneficial treatment effect in bDMARD-refractory patients across subgroups based on baseline characteristics and prior bDMARD use,” the researchers conclude. “Because the population of rheumatoid arthritis patients who are TNF-inhibitor inadequate responders is increasing, this finding may be clinically relevant.”

Dr. Genovese did not respond to a request for comment.

Eli Lilly & Co. and Incyte sponsored the trial. Eli Lilly employed half of the authors and had various relationships with several others.

Reference

  1. Genovese MC, Kremer JM, Kartman CE, et al. Response to baricitinib based on prior biologic use in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Feb 3. [Epub ahead of print]

 

Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsDrug UpdatesRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20)baricitinibbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugsbiologic-refractory RARA-BEACONRheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Related Articles

    Baricitinib Effective for Treating Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis

    February 15, 2017

    Soon, rheumatologists may have another drug to offer their patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RRA) for whom effective and safe treatment remains challenging. A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine shows that patients with RRA treated with once-daily baricitinib in a 4 mg dose had a significant clinical improvement in symptoms of…

    Baricitinib Appears Effective in Biologic-Refractory RA

    March 27, 2018

    NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—The selective Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor baricitinib appears also to help patients whose rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has not responded adequately to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, according to results from the RA-BEACON randomized trial. The previously published overall results from RA-BEACON showed that baricitinib-treated patients had significantly better functional and clinical…

    Baricitinib May Exhibit Better Efficacy Than Adalimumab for RA

    March 7, 2017

    In a recent study, baricitinib proved more effective than adalimumab in treating adults with RA through 52 weeks…

    Baricitinib Has Promising Clinical Trial Results for Treating RA

    May 18, 2016

    Recent clinical trials have shown that baricitinib is safe and effective for treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have proved non-responsive to multiple biologic treatments…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences