Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Baricitinib Effective for Treating Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis

Mary Beth Nierengarten  |  Issue: February 2017  |  February 15, 2017

Unlike many other studies that have evaluated biologics largely in patients with RA who are naive to biologics or failed first-line treatment, such as those with early disease, he stresses the study by Genovese and colleagues is unique in that it evaluates efficacy of a new agent in a difficult-to-treat population. “We lack good interventional randomized controlled trials involving these challenging patients,” he says.

Oral JAKs

Baricitinib is the second drug in the relatively new class of drugs called oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and 2 inhibitors. The first drug in this class, tofacitinib, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in May 2012 for RRA patients.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Saying he currently uses tofacitinib for his RRA patients, Dr. Paz says the potential availability of baricitinib will provide an additional treatment option from the JAK-inhibitor class of agents for patients who do not respond well to tofacitinib. “This would be similar to the current strategy of exchanging between biologics from the same class, [such as] TNF inhibitors, to find the right match for our patients,” he says.

Dr. Genovese

Dr. Genovese

Currently, baricitinib is under regulatory review by the FDA for treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. According to a press release by the manufacturer of the drug, four Phase 3 clinical trials of the drug have been conducted to “support regulatory submission in most countries.”2

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“Hopefully, [these results] will translate to a commercially approved therapy to help patients with active disease,” said Dr. Genovese.

Safety

One big concern raised by the study is the adverse events reported with baricitinib, says Dr. Paz. Both groups of patients receiving baricitinib at the 2 mg and 4 mg doses had higher rates of adverse events than the placebo group (71% and 77% vs. 64%, respectively), including higher rates of infections (44% and 40% vs. 31%, respectively). Headache, upper respiratory infections and nasopharyngitis were the most common adverse events in the patients treated with baricitinib. None of the patients had opportunistic infections, tuberculosis or gastrointestinal perforations.

Rates of serious adverse events were highest in the 4 mg baricitinib group followed by the placebo group, with the fewest in the 2 mg baricitinib group (10%, 7% and 4%, respectively). In the 4 mg group, the serious adverse events included two nonmelanoma skin cancers and two major adverse cardiovascular events, which included a fatal stroke.

Emphasizing that the adverse events reported in the study are high, Dr. Paz points out the high rate of serious adverse events in the placebo group indicates the need to ask why this patient population had such a high rate of adverse events.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsResearch RheumRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:adverse eventsbaricitinibClinicaldrugoutcomepatient carerefractory rheumatoid arthritisResearchrheumatologystudyTreatmenttrial

Related Articles

    Brodalumab Approved for Plaque Psoriasis, Plus Baricitinib Effiicacy Studied for RA

    April 20, 2017

    Brodalumab Approved for Plaque Psoriasis The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved brodalumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin 17 (IL‑17).1,2 Brodalumab (Siliq) was approved for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy and have failed to respond to, or have lost response to, other…

    Baricitinib May Exhibit Better Efficacy Than Adalimumab for RA

    March 7, 2017

    In a recent study, baricitinib proved more effective than adalimumab in treating adults with RA through 52 weeks…

    ANCA-Associated Vasculitis in Systemic Sclerosis

    October 1, 2014

    A case report

    Baricitinib Has Promising Clinical Trial Results for Treating RA

    May 18, 2016

    Recent clinical trials have shown that baricitinib is safe and effective for treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have proved non-responsive to multiple biologic treatments…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences