Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Biologic Drugs for Psoriasis Are Rarely Stopped for AEs

Joan Raymond  |  June 6, 2015

NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—Real-world psoriasis patients receiving biologic therapies rarely stop taking the drugs because of adverse effects, researchers say.

Although data from long-term registries have shown similar results, “the demographics of patients in registries are somewhat different than those of patients in real-world practices,” Dr. Jensen Yeung told Reuters Health by email.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“I have treated many patients with biological therapies for psoriasis and I must say that an adverse event leading to discontinuation of treatment is not a common occurrence,” said Dr. Yeung of Women’s College Hospital and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre at the University of Toronto, Canada.

“This study confirmed that other dermatologists have similar experiences,” he said.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Yeung and colleagues reviewed data on 398 adults who received 545 treatments with etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, or ustekinumab, in varying combinations and doses.

As reported online May 28 in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, their average psoriasis duration was 19.4 years, and roughly two thirds were male. Common comorbidities included psoriatic arthritis in 38%, hypertension in 18%, dyslipidemia in 12%, and diabetes in 11%.

The median duration of therapy until withdrawal because of an AE was 23.5 months.

AEs leading to withdrawal were uncommon, however. Overall, 22 AEs (4%) led to withdrawal of biologic therapy, for an incidence rate of 1.97 events/100 patient-years. More specifically, the incidence rates per 100 patient-years were 1.13 (2.29%) for etanercept, 4.96 (15%) for infliximab, 2.38 (2.99%) for adalimumab, and 1.38 (2.84%) for ustekinumab.

“Infections and malignancy associated with withdrawal of therapy accounted for 1.65% of all biologic treatments and around 5% of all discontinued biologic treatments,” the authors reported.

By comparison, in two previous multicenter observational studies, 4.02% and 6.14% of AEs had led to discontinuation, they noted.

“Our study provides data to complement existing safety profiles based on clinical trials, and shows that biologic therapies are associated with a low rate of withdrawal-related AEs in real-world clinical practice,” they wrote.

Dr. Colby Evans, chair-elect of the National Psoriasis Foundation board of directors, told Reuters Health by email, “This study is interesting . . . because it focuses specifically on adverse reactions to the medications without concern for efficacy.”

“The design is retrospective, which is easier to accomplish but limits its power to detect subtle trends,” said Dr. Evans, who was not involved in the study.

“It is helpful to confirm that biologic medications for psoriasis seem relatively safe and that the rates of side effects that lead to discontinuation are low overall and not any higher than in the original studies used to approve the drugs.”

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsDrug Updates Tagged with:adverse drug reactionBiologicsPsoriasis

Related Articles

    Immune-Related Adverse Events with Use of Checkpoint Inhibitors for Immunotherapy of Cancer

    March 29, 2017

    Introduction: Major advances in the past two decades have enhanced our understanding of the complex interactions between the immune system and cancer cells and their environment. Genetic and epigenetic alterations in tumor cells result in the expression of diverse antigens that can elicit an immune response, primarily mediated by T cells. Immune responses are regulated…

    Pulmonary Adverse Events with Low-Dose Methotrexate

    November 24, 2020

    In this large placebo-controlled trial, Sparks et al. examined the predictors and severity of pulmonary adverse events (AEs) in patients taking low-dose MTX. The researchers found that low-dose MTX increased the risk of pulmonary AEs, including possible pneumonitis.

    MicroOne / shutterstock.com

    Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance, Part 2: Psoriasis

    May 17, 2019

    Over the past few years, bio­similars and other new drugs have been introduced to treat rheumatic illnesses. Some of the conditions we treat have numerous drug option; others have few or only off-label options. This series, “Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance,” provides streamlined information on the administration of biologic, biosimilar and other medications used to…

    Draft Guidelines & Recommendations for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

    March 19, 2019

    CHICAGO—The treatment of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is historically directed by clinical subtype. During a session at the 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, speakers addressed the biological classification and treatment of JIA, discussing draft guidelines and recommendations, the impact of computer modeling on identifying JIA subtypes and subgroups of chronic arthritis. Guidelines & Recommendations…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences