Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Clinical Cutting Edge

Jane Jerrard  |  July 1, 2007

All diagnostic modalities have limitations, Dr. Schneider pointed out. “Lab and CSF tests aren’t sensitive or specific—the same is true of MRIs—and angiography is frequently positive and lacks sensitivity for small vessel disease.” The solution: Brain and leptomeningeal biopsies should be used in cases of children with suspected PACNS who have negative angiography. Additionally, identifying patients at high risk of progression may help determine whether they’ll require immunosuppressive therapy.

At the Hospital for Sick Children, four patients with biopsy-proven small vessel vasculitis were treated as follows. All four were given prednisone, two were given cyclophosphamide, and one was given azathioprine. Three of the four recovered with no neurological deficit, and there was a relapse in one patient recently, six years after treatment.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Schneider’s research shows that the patients with angiographic PACNS most likely to get progressive disease had three indications: neurocognitive dysfunction; multifocal, bilateral MR lesions; and distal stenoses on angiogram. This led him to think that the classification for vasculitis should be re-examined and should include the following categories: progressive, non-progressive, and small vessel (biopsy), each with a separate treatment. (See Table 1)

Jane Jerrard is a journalist based in Chicago.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsMyositisSjögren’s DiseaseVasculitis Tagged with:Diagnostic CriteriaMeetingmyositisSjogren'sTreatmentVasculitis

Related Articles

    New Tools for Myositis Diagnosis, Classification & Management

    April 15, 2019

    CHICAGO—At Hot Topics in Myositis, a session at the 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, three experts discussed new classification criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and offered practical primers on overlap myositis conditions and inclusion body myositis (IBM). New Myositis Classification Criteria After a 10-year development process, the new EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for Adult and Juvenile…

    Autoantibodies in Autoimmune Myopathy

    Autoantibodies in Autoimmune Myopathy

    September 18, 2017

    In recent years, scientists and clinicians have learned a great deal about autoantibodies occurring in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). These new discoveries have reshaped our understanding of distinct clinical pheno­types in IIMs. Scientists continue to learn more about how these auto­antibodies shape pathophysiology, diagnosis, disease monitoring, prognosis and optimum treatment. Moving forward, these autoantibodies will…

    Myositis Mysteries

    January 1, 2008

    Why isn’t my myositis patient getting better?

    Diagnosis: Myopathy

    July 1, 2009

    Presentation and evaluation of metabolic causes

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences