Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Coding Corner Answer: Incident-To

Staff  |  Issue: June 2012  |  June 10, 2012

Take the challenge…

Answer: 99214-25, 20610-LT

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Diagnosis: 714.0, 535.40

This patient encounter should be coded as 99214-25 and 20610 under the nonphysician provider number, and the expected reimbursement would be 85% of Part B Physician Fee Schedule.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

To receive 100% reimbursement of the approved Medicare Part B Fee Schedule, a NPP can only see an established patient with an established diagnosis. This is done by billing under the supervising physician’s provider number.

If an established patient presents with a new problem during the visit, the NPP can either continue the visit and bill under his or her own number to receive 85% reimbursement of the approved Medicare Part B Fee Schedule, or have the physician take over the visit (take the complete history and perform the examination) and bill out the charges under their own NPI number.

It is not acceptable for the NPP to consult with the physician and have the physician give his or her input on the new issue. This is considered a shared visit and shared visits are only allowed for Medicare patients in an inpatient setting.

Modifier -25 is used to indicate that the patient required a significant, separately identifiable E/M service on the same day as the patient received a minor procedure. When a patient is scheduled to have a procedure done, unless there is a significant, separately identifiable issue, an additional E/M visit should not be billed. However, this patient had a separate problem (gastritis) that required evaluation and management services and, therefore, the portion of the encounter related to the diagnosis and treatment of the patient’s gastritis are separately billable with the use of modifier -25.

The E/M services related to the patient’s gastric symptoms include:

  • Detailed history: History of present illness was extended, the review of system was extended and the past, family, social history (PFSH) was completed (Once the PFSH is documented and unless there are changes, it is permissible to reference that there was no change from original documentation).
  • Detailed exam: There were six organ systems examined.
  • Moderate complexity decision making: The number of diagnoses or problems was extended—one stabilized problem was worsening and one new problem with work-up, which was treatment of a side effect (gastritis) requiring a change in medication therapy and additional prescription medication to treat the problem. The amount of data to be reviewed was minimal. The level of risk was moderate for prescription drug management.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingPractice Support Tagged with:AC&RAmerican College of Rheumatology (ACR)BillingCodingincident-toMedicareNPPPractice Management

Related Articles

    Medicare Incident-to Billing Rules, Pitfalls

    May 15, 2015

    In today’s busy rheumatology practices, the services of nurse practitioners, physician assistants, occupational therapists and clinical nurse specialists are a great asset for patient flow, as well as increased revenue. As the growth of nonphysician providers (NPPs) in rheumatology practices has evolved, it has become increasingly important to understand the incident-to rules and avoid the…

    Incident-To Guidelines for Nonphysician Healthcare Providers

    June 10, 2012

    Coding and documentation guidelines for billing and documenting nonphysician healthcare provider services.

    How Non-Physician Providers Can Help Your Practice

    November 17, 2017

    New data shows that both private and public rheumatology practices benefit financially by hiring non-physician providers (NPPs). But when should practices hire NPPs?

    Coding Corner Question

    July 1, 2010

    July’s Coding Challenge

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences