Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Control Quality Anxiety

Staff  |  Issue: November 2006  |  November 1, 2006

For example, prior to the quality program, only 44% to 50% of juvenile RA patients at Children’s Hospital received guideline-directed uveitis screenings; now 95% get these screenings on schedule. In addition, patient data have been entered into a Web-based registry, so children with juvenile RA (and their parents) can look up their own labs, medications, and other medical information online to help them monitor and self-manage their illness.

Dr. Passo also understands the reluctance of many rheumatologists to embrace the quality movement. “Doctors feel they’re already going above and beyond,” he says. “They think this is just one more thing that’s going to exhaust their resources—which is what I had feared, as well.” But he says that what they learned at Children’s “has become ingrained in everything we do on a day-to-day basis. It’s part of our culture.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Importantly, pay-for-performance “remained in background,” notes Dr. Passo. He wasn’t sure that the pediatricians and faculty even recognized this was a component of the program. “All of our efforts were based on improving outcomes for kids with different diseases across the institution,” he says.

Specialists Get Ready

Dr. Anderson says large employers and the government want to identify high-quality, low-cost physicians and hospitals. “Specialists control 80% of all healthcare spending in this country. As specialists, we will be held increasingly accountable for the effectiveness and efficiency of our care.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The Quality of Care Subcommittee is looking at options for data collection and reporting tools that will enable documentation of the quality of care. In addition to physician-based tools, the subcommittee is also looking at tools that can capture patient-generated data, such as a patient’s degree of pain. Ideally, pre-visit patient information gathered electronically and displayed appropriately to the physician may improve the efficiency of the office visit.

Dr. Anderson is a strong supporter of the quality movement, but he is well aware of the potential risks. “There are challenges in finding the balance between executing evidence-based care and protecting time to continue practicing the art of medicine, so important to all of us in rheumatology,” he says. He believes that ACR needs to carefully follow what the private payers are doing, and to work with entities such as the AMA, the National Quality Forum, the National Committee for Quality Assurance, and AQA Alliance to ensure that ACR’s measures are being adopted and that the measures are clinically relevant and feasible for implementation.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice SupportQuality Assurance/Improvement Tagged with:PatientsPay-for-PerformancePractice toolsQualityReimbursement

Related Articles

    2022 PFS Final Rule for the Quality Payment Program Published

    December 2, 2021

    The ACR highlights essential information for providers for 2022 MIPS reporting in the 2022 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule, published Nov. 2.

    2023 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule for Quality Payment Program Published

    January 6, 2023

    The ACR highlights essential policy and reporting changes to the Quality Payment Program for performance year 2023 and beyond. Key changes include policies regarding the development of new MIPS Value Pathways and refinement of subgroup participation.

    2023 Proposed Rule for the Quality Payment Program Released

    July 25, 2022

    The ACR RISE Registry staff highlights need-to-know information and key changes for the 2023 performance year as outlined in the proposed rule released July 7.

    Rheumatology Stakeholders Talk Quality

    December 1, 2007

    ACR urged to accelerate efforts to develop quality indicators

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences