Dermatology Case Answer: History of ANCA–Associated Vasculitis, Fever, Rash

Figure 2: Histopathology reveals dense neutrophilic infiltrate with marked papillary dermal edema, leukocytoclasia with no evidence of vasculitic changes.

Take the Dermatology Case Challenge.

B: Sweet’s syndrome (drug-induced)

Sweet’s syndrome, also known as acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis, is characterized by fever, peripheral neutrophilia, and multiple asymmetric diffuse edematous, erythematous skin lesions. The lesions may be so edematous, in fact, as to have a “pseudovesicular” appearance on their surface and may contain a subtle pustular component from the abundance of neutrophils present in the lesions. A deep variant involving adipose tissue is known as subcutaneous Sweet’s syndrome and has the deep, tender nodular appearance of other panniculitides clinically (erythema nodosum-like lesions). Malignancy-associated Sweet’s syndrome may present in a bullous or ulcerated variant mimicking pyoderma gangrenosum. Other extracutaneous manifestations of Sweet’s occur less frequently and may affect almost any organ system including, for example, culture-negative pulmonary neutrophilic infiltrates.¹

Sweet’s generally presents in three scenarios: idiopathic or “classic,” malignancy-associated, and drug-induced. In our patient, the initiation of azathioprine as maintenance therapy for her vasculitis correlated with the onset of the lesions and the lesions resolved with discontinuation and a brief oral steroid taper. Drug-induced Sweet’s was first reported in 1986 in a patient taking trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; however, the most frequent cause is the administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor.² There are numerous reports of azathioprine-induced Sweet’s syndrome, with discontinuation leading to resolution and recurrence upon rechallenge.^3-5

The histopathologic findings of Sweet’s on biopsy include a diffuse, dense infiltrate of mature neutrophils with significant papillary dermal edema (correlating with the “juicy” edematous plaques of Sweet’s). Leukocytoclasia may be present but vasculitic changes are usually absent. These findings can also be observed secondary to an infectious agent, so the work-up should always include tissue for bacterial, fungal, mycobacterial, and perhaps even viral cultures. Further systemic work-up for extracutaneous manifestations is driven largely by symptoms and a work-up for underlying malignancy should be considered in the absence of an otherwise clear etiology.⁶ Criteria for drug-induced Sweet’s exist as suggested by Walker and Cohen.⁷

First-line management is via treatment of any underlying condition (e.g., malignancy) and discontinuation of offending medication in the case of drug-induced variants. Topical, intralesional, and oral corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment. The condition is exquisitely sensitive to steroids, making this one of the diagnostic criteria. Other antineutrophilic agents such as colchicine and dapsone have been used, as well as potassium iodide. A host of second- and third-line therapies exist as reported in case reports and small series for recalcitrant disease.¹

Discussion of Other Choices

A. Bacterial Sepsis: The diffuse, randomly scattered erythematous nodules and plaques of Sweet’s should prompt initial concern for disseminated bacterial infection in the febrile patient. Appropriate infectious disease work-up is crucial to what is often a diagnosis of exclusion. As mentioned above, the histopathologic features on biopsy of sheets of neutrophils (together with the absence of a predominant vasculitic change) should immediately invoke concern for infection, and thus tissue culture of biopsy material is an important diagnostic element in suspected cases. A febrile patient with culture-negative samples and abrupt-onset lesions clinically consistent with those of Sweet’s in the right clinical context should prompt consideration of the diagnosis. An alternative diagnosis of infection always remains a primary concern in these patients.