Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Ethics Forum: Should Doctors Recommend Fitness/Diet Monitoring Devices?

Sara M. Rothberger, PhD, Linda S. Ehrlich-Jones, RN, PhD, & Christine A. Pellegrini, PhD  |  Issue: January 2018  |  January 19, 2018

Image Source Trading Ltd / SHUTTERSTOCK.COM

Image Source Trading Ltd / SHUTTERSTOCK.COM

The Case

A 58-year-old patient with knee osteoarthritis has been decreasing her physical activity over the past several years due to painful joints, which has resulted in significant weight gain. At her appointment, you encourage her to engage in more physical activity and eat a well-balanced diet.

A few weeks later, the patient returns to your office looking for recommendations for weight loss. She insists she has been more active and is eating better, but her weight has not changed. A few of her coworkers use physical activity monitors or smartphone apps to help them be more active and lose weight. She is wondering if these would work for her. She is curious about your opinion of these and whether they could work for her, too, especially when she is facing chronic knee pain. She is worried that if she continues on this path of inactivity and continued weight gain, she will likely need a joint replacement in the next few years.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The Dilemma

Should clinicians be recommending the use of these technologies to assist with behavior change, even if the efficacy of using these technologies for modifying diet, physical activity and weight is unknown? Should clinicians be considering personal factors (e.g., socioeconomic status, technology literacy, physical limitations) that may influence the patient’s ability to access or utilize the technology prior to determining whether a recommendation should be made?

The Evidence

The use of technology to facilitate behavior change has become increasingly more popular over the years as the utilization of smartphones, smartphone applications and wearable physical activity monitors continues to rise. According to the Pew Research Center, over 77% of adults own a smartphone, including 42% of those older than 65.1 It is estimated that one in six adults uses a wearable device (i.e., smartwatch or fitness band) as well.2

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Smartphone and wearable users have the opportunity to download numerous apps to pair with these devices in efforts to track fitness and diet or nutrition. Of an estimated 165,000 mobile health apps currently on the market, 57,750 (35%) of these are fitness based and another 19,800 (12%) are diet and nutrition based.3

Although these health-related apps and wearables are nearly ubiquitous in today’s society, recommending the use of these devices to facilitate diet and activity change may not be as straightforward as it may seem. First, most of the commercially available smartphone apps are not guided by theory and may not incorporate the evidence-based behavior change techniques necessary to modify and sustain newly adopted behaviors.4,5

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EthicsProfessional TopicsTechnology Tagged with:Ethicspatient carephysical fitnessTechnology

Related Articles

    Mobile Health Devices May Have Limited Use in Rheumatology

    April 2, 2014

    Challenges exist in developing m-health apps for rheumatology patients because of the difficulty in pinpointing what needs to be measured

    Andrey_Popov / shutterstock.com

    Rheumatology & Digital Wearables: What’s on the Horizon?

    May 15, 2020

    SNOWMASS VILLAGE, COLO.—A major workforce shortage, a population of patients taking immunosuppressants where safety concerns and the patient experience are critical, and an increasing focus on remote patient monitoring and telehealth are driving a discussion regarding the role digital wearables play in rheumatologic care. “We need to be more thoughtful and efficient in taking care…

    Google Glass Has Potential for Rheumatology, Orthopedic Surgery

    November 2, 2014

    Wearable smart-glass device could enable untethered access to electronic health records, be conduit for clinical decision making

    Expansion of Mobile Health Apps Makes Physicians’ Job Easier

    April 2, 2014

    Rheumatologists choose, review top mobile health devices

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences