Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Drug Risk Versus Benefit

Gretchen Henkel  |  Issue: April 2009  |  April 1, 2009

SAN FRANCISCO—Advances in biologic and nonbiologic DMARDs have transformed the lives of many patients with rheumatic diseases. At the same time, balancing the risks of these therapies with the benefits has rendered treatment decisions more complex. The ACR’s Drug Safety Subcommittee, in partnership with the ARHP, sponsored an afternoon panel discussion at the October 2008 ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific Meeting. The session, “The Big Picture—Balancing Risk and Benefit fro the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Physician and Patient Perspectives,” updated rheumatologists about current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) postapproval safety monitoring activities and clarified techniques for helping patients weigh risks and benefits of treatment choices.

The impetus for presenting the panel came from results of an ACR member survey, reported subcommittee chair and co-moderator Daniel J. Lovell, MD, MPH, interim director of the division of rheumatology at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, in his introduction. (Arthur Kavanaugh, MD, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego, also a subcommittee member, shared moderator duties with Dr. Lovell.) Results of the survey showed that 85% of survey respondents were “highly” or “extremely” concerned about drug safety, while 65% were less than “satisfied” about their own knowledge about drug safety.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

FDA’s Current Initiatives

Paul Seligman, MD, MPH, associate director of safety, policy, and communication at the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, began by noting that the FDA recognizes that there are practical as well as ethical constraints in the agency’s ability to answer all questions related to a product prior to its approval. Among those constraints: all drugs have risks, premarket clinical trials are not large enough to detect rare safety events, and uncertainty is inherent in clinical trials.

Responding to increasing demands for more transparency and timeliness about postmarket safety issues, the FDA, in the past two to three years, has stepped up its outreach to consumers and providers. The Consumer Health Information Web site (www.fda.gov/consumer) disseminates information about a wide range of food, health, and safety topics; also, the FDA now partners with WebMD (www.Webmd.com/fda) to expand its public health advisories and ongoing safety reviews. For providers, the FDA publishes a quarterly Drug Safety newsletter (www.fda.gov/cder/dsn); maintains a MedWatch listserv (www.fda.gov/medWatch.elist.htm) with a current subscriber list of over 120,000; and partners with healthcare organizations to distribute electronic product safety updates. A recent example of information for providers was a September 4, 2008, FDA Alert regarding inconsistent recognition of histoplasmosis and other invasive fungal infections in patients taking TNF blockers, prompted by a case report and a subsequent FDA search of the Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) database.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Uncategorized Tagged with:BiologicsDisease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)FDASafety

Related Articles

    What Do Your Patients Think About You?

    May 9, 2012

    Why your practice needs patient-satisfaction surveys

    Drug Updates

    January 1, 2009

    Information on safety, labeling changes, and pharmaceutical research

    Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance, Part 3: Rheumatoid Arthritis

    August 16, 2019

    Over the past few years, bio­similars and other new drugs have been introduced to treat rheumatic illnesses. Some of the conditions we treat have numerous drug options, others have few or only off-label options. This series, “Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance,” provides streamlined information on the administration of biologic, biosimilar and small molecule inhibitor drugs…

    FDA Provides 2020 Rheumatology Drug Update

    December 17, 2020

    Three FDA representatives discuss new drug indications, safety precautions and label changes, & an emergency program to rapidly evaluate existing immunomodulating therapies for use in COVID-19 patients.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences