Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Electronic Medical Records Have Mixed Impact on Quality, Quantity of Healthcare

David S. Knapp, MD, FACR  |  Issue: January 2017  |  January 17, 2017

The widespread implementation of electronic medical records (EMRs) and electronic health records (EHRs) has significantly changed the quality and quantity of healthcare for both the better and the worse. The digitalization of medical records provides comprehensive documentation of all events and actions associated with an individual’s medical care. Likewise, legibility, accountability and credibility are greatly improved by access to all information pertinent to a patient’s healthcare.

Under the current fee-for-service reimbursement system (which is soon to be replaced by a fee-for-value reimbursement system), the EMR also acts like a giant cash register that tracks the quality and quantity of medical services provided that are documented to be medically necessary in order to reduce waste, fraud and abuse and maximize provider accountability and reimbursement for medical services.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

So what’s not to love? Plenty!

The Bad & the Ugly

The sheer volume of documentation that is displayed all at one time may overwhelm the healthcare provider, who can get distracted in locating the information he needs in a sea of medical documentation that the provider must somehow confirm has been reviewed. Ultimately, the healthcare provider is taking care of the EHR demands as much as the patient, if not more.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Thoughtful consideration of a patient’s concerns and complaints, along with formulation of a diagnosis and treatment plan (not to mention examination), is undermined by the inflexible demands of the EHR program, which will not progress to the next task until all tasks required are completed. What used to be a one- or two-page succinct document describing an office visit has morphed into a 6–10-page regurgitation of previous medical records that may or may not be relevant to current healthcare needs (also known as note bloat).

Pressure to Diagnose

In order to facilitate care, the healthcare provider is required to provide a diagnosis to proceed with permission for further diagnostic and therapeutic efforts, regardless of certainty that the diagnostic label is accurate and correct. The key to the kingdom of both therapy and payment is the diagnostic label, which, hopefully, is accurate and reflects the correct diagnosis.

A medical diagnosis involves the identification of the nature and cause of illness symptoms and the determination of the cause of an associated disease process. Sometimes, symptoms of illness are not associated with a defined disease process, and sometimes, a disease process is silent and not associated with illness symptoms.

Illness is how a patient feels (subjectively reported), and disease is the identification of abnormal body tissue and/or function that can be measured directly by examination or indirectly by diagnostic studies.

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EMRsPractice SupportTechnology Tagged with:Documentationefficiencyelectronic health recordelectronic medical recordfee-for-serviceimpactpatient carephysicianPractice ManagementQualityrheumatologistrheumatologySafetyvalue

Related Articles

    Electronic Health Records Present Communication Challenges for Physicians

    October 1, 2014

    Digitized patient records have transformed how clinicians record, understand clinical information

    Electronic Health Record Documentation Guidelines

    January 19, 2018

    The operations management team in healthcare practices is expected to have an effective coding compliance program in place that is continually evaluated and reevaluated. To accurately assess the program’s effectiveness, several outcome indicators must be measured, including error rates in the provider’s documentation and the electronic health record (EHR). Due to increased scrutiny by the…

    Study: Don’t Automatically Blame Burnout on Electronic Health Records

    May 12, 2022

    When it comes to experiencing burnout, time spent in an electronic health records (EHR) system appears to be only a minor contributing factor. Although clinicians and other healthcare professionals may log many hours at the keyboard putting information into the EHR, other factors likely play a bigger role in the workplace exhaustion and feelings of…

    Electronic Health Record Contracts Done Right

    June 10, 2012

    Consider both your practice’s needs and the long-term viability of the technology when selecting an EHR system.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences