Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Electronic Medical Records Have Mixed Impact on Quality, Quantity of Healthcare

David S. Knapp, MD, FACR  |  Issue: January 2017  |  January 17, 2017

Unfortunately, the “note bloat” discussed above not only overwhelms the senses of a provider trying to locate clinically meaningful information from the past, the multiple episodes of healthcare contact make drilling down into the electronic records extremely laborious and time consuming. Often, hundreds of individual notations for dates-of-service document communications with the patient by multiple providers and staff members over time. Sorting out the clinically significant ones from the less meaningful diagnostic labels can be an overwhelming task with regard to the time and effort required.

After all is said and done, the conscientious practitioner should remember the old saying, “Don’t believe everything you read!” Rather than being lured to the path of least resistance to facilitate meeting patient expectations, as well as administrative demands, with regard to development of a diagnosis with a treatment plan, critical thinking and intellectual honesty must prevail—even if not appreciated by the patient or the various insurance and administrative requirements needed to allow testing, treatment and payment for services provided.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Many physicians have learned how to game the system by telling white lies that allow the healthcare provider to manipulate the system to get things done, as well as look good on paper.

Thoughtful consideration of a patient’s concerns & complaints, along with formulation of a diagnosis & treatment plan (not to mention examination), is undermined by the inflexible demands of the EHR program, which will not progress to the next task until all tasks required are completed.

Where We Are

In summary, the EMR promotes diagnostic labeling, which justifies the medical treatment provided rather than valid diagnoses. This flawed model of healthcare allows reasonable but unproven concepts regarding disease processes to be accepted over time as fact with resulting bad results purchased at a high cost both financially for society and personally for the patient.

The diagnostic label has become the modern equivalent of the deus ex machina (a god introduced by means of a crane in ancient Greek and Roman drama to decide a final outcome). If a healthcare provider needs an explanation or justification for services provided or requested, just come up with the needed “diagnosis.”

Also, this author believes that having a non-medical scribe in the room doesn’t help the doctor–patient relationship, although the physician is relieved of some of the documentation burden.

EMR documentation requirements are changing the diagnostic paradigm for all physicians, who have to fulfill burdensome documentation demands, as well as provide thoughtful, compassionate and competent patient care.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EMRsPractice SupportTechnology Tagged with:Documentationefficiencyelectronic health recordelectronic medical recordfee-for-serviceimpactpatient carephysicianPractice ManagementQualityrheumatologistrheumatologySafetyvalue

Related Articles

    Electronic Health Records Present Communication Challenges for Physicians

    October 1, 2014

    Digitized patient records have transformed how clinicians record, understand clinical information

    Electronic Health Record Documentation Guidelines

    January 19, 2018

    The operations management team in healthcare practices is expected to have an effective coding compliance program in place that is continually evaluated and reevaluated. To accurately assess the program’s effectiveness, several outcome indicators must be measured, including error rates in the provider’s documentation and the electronic health record (EHR). Due to increased scrutiny by the…

    Study: Don’t Automatically Blame Burnout on Electronic Health Records

    May 12, 2022

    When it comes to experiencing burnout, time spent in an electronic health records (EHR) system appears to be only a minor contributing factor. Although clinicians and other healthcare professionals may log many hours at the keyboard putting information into the EHR, other factors likely play a bigger role in the workplace exhaustion and feelings of…

    Electronic Health Record Contracts Done Right

    June 10, 2012

    Consider both your practice’s needs and the long-term viability of the technology when selecting an EHR system.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences